BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 105981103 | over 4 years ago | Hi, I've reverted this changeset as it only dragged existing ways out of line, as per the warnings given above. Please check and correct any warnings before uploading. Regards Bernard. |
| 105980897 | over 4 years ago | Hi, I've reverted this changeset as it only dragged existing ways out of line, as per the warnings given above. Please check and correct any warnings before uploading. Regards Bernard. |
| 105981221 | over 4 years ago | Hi, I've reverted this changeset as it only dragged existing ways out of line, as per the warnings given above. Please check and correct any warnings before uploading. Regards Bernard. |
| 105935703 | over 4 years ago | Hi, These grass and wood areas don't extend to the centerline of highways, they extend only to the edge of the highway area, (usually a hedge line. This is very easy to discern so there's no need to obstruct highways with woods or grassland. Could you please stop mapping in this way and please correct the incorrect mapping. Regards Bernard. |
| 105919292 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. When a way needs amending/correcting in OSM it's OSM practice to correct the existing way, thus all history is maintained. I've made your new way an extension of the existing path. I also moved your new way off of the hedge that you had somehow placed it on top of. I think actually the path extends further SW. Regards Bernard. |
| 105906791 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The tag sidewalk=separate is supposed to be used where the sidewalk is actually mapped, and as a separate way. Please see:- sidewalk=* In this instance it looks (from imagery) like there is a footpath each side of Hastings Road so the tag would be sidewalk=both. Can you correct this or should I? Regards Bernard. |
| 105662292 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Thanks for responding with confirmation. I've amended the address tagging to suit OSM practice. There should be no problem finding and routing to the property once apps/software have been updated with this correct data. Regards Bernard. |
| 105886963 | over 4 years ago | Hi, I've redrawn the grass areas to unjoin them from the highway center lines. They don't look like they extend over the roads, footways and parking areas. Regards Bernard. |
| 105856693 | over 4 years ago | It would also be good foy your changesets to fewer edits over smaller areas. Thus you or anyone else can more easily make corrections. Regards Bernard. |
| 105856693 | over 4 years ago | Hi, You're still joining retaining walls to railway lines. Please could you check your edits and correct any problems. Regards Bernard. |
| 105789693 | over 4 years ago | Hi, You mapped and joined several retaining walls (barriers), to the rail lines. This would make for very uncomfortable train travel. I've unjoined all that I can find. Could you please check all your edits to make sure there are no more inadvertent barriers to railways. It is extremely difficult to check the huge area you've mapped on. Regards Bernard. |
| 105416229 | over 4 years ago | Hi this has made a triplicated highway. Way: Route de Bayeux-Tilly (947701217) and Way: Route de Bayeux-Tilly (947702752) are on top of the existing Way: 220893182. Could you please remove the offending ways they disrupt routing? Regards Bernard. |
| 105288861 | over 4 years ago | Hi, you are making a lot of duplicated highways. |
| 105288442 | over 4 years ago | Hi, you've made a duplicated highway here. Regards Bernard. |
| 102729115 | over 4 years ago | Hi, You've placed highway Way: Ciclovia Empresarial (929145004) on to of an existing highway making a duplicate way. The same problem with Way: Acesso estação Paço de Arcos (929145003), Regards Bernard. |
| 105761272 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. OSM is a live worldwide database with which to compile ground-truth maps. As such everything added to OSM must be accurate and verifiable. You describe this as an online facility thus I take it as nothing verifiable on the ground. If it is an office it would not be the whole building, and a POI would be appropriate. Further, you've removed the residential tag. Thus I've reverted this changeset.
Regards Bernard. |
| 105316934 | over 4 years ago | Duplicate store removed. |
| 105319143 | over 4 years ago | Hi, You have lots of warnings about buildings crossing over each other here. Could you please resolve the problems? Regards Bernard. |
| 105633178 | over 4 years ago | Fiction removed Way: 949120743 and several other duplicated highways. Regards Bernard. |
| 100908532 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The school is already mapped (Way: 353161178) as a multipolygon. I've added the name to the relation. Regards Bernard. |