BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 105717868 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Single trees are shown as a single node on OSM. So I've made an amendment to your climbing tree to suit OSM practice. Regards Bernard. |
| 105679305 | over 4 years ago | Hi, some field edges seem to be drawn around the shadows of trees. Regards Bernard, |
| 105662292 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are you sure you have the right position and address because this house is nearer to Raleigh way than Pendleton? If it is correct then correct tags would be:-
The tags addr:housename=Sunny City and name=42 Pendleton are incorrect and should be removed. Regards Bernard. |
| 105535448 | over 4 years ago | Hi, you made an admin boundary into a highway also removing the admin tag. This could cause serious malfunction to routers. I've removed the mistakes. Regards Bernard. |
| 105537203 | over 4 years ago | Hello, I can find no reference to these changes (new roundabout and toll gantry). Even if genuine the mapping seems poor, you have 3 warnings above. Could you please state a reference for the changes? If this is fiction please remove the changes ASAP. Regards Bernard |
| 105460409 | over 4 years ago | Way: Hill view Avenue (948019955), duplicated highway removed |
| 102886493 | over 4 years ago | No response so I've removed the tag |
| 105371613 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I'm sorry to say that the new Way: 947390907 which you added has no tags to show what it is. I think you meant it as a path but it is placed atop an existing highway (Way: 4252430) thus making a duplication of a highway. When a feature needs amending or correcting OSM practice is to do this to the existing way. I realise your mistake is inadvertent and have left it for now so you can see what I mean. You did add the path to the route relation. Because so many features here are all joined together I think it's best to revert your changeset. If you need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 105290479 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. May I suggest you look at the Maxar Imagery in the iD editor. It's the latest imagery in which you'll see your houses are a bit out. To select an imagery layer click the background settings icon on the right side of the screen, then click select Maxar. Regards Bernard. |
| 105190714 | over 4 years ago | Hi, you made a lot of duplicate nodes around here, I think I've removed all the duplicates. You can see above the changeset resulted in 15 warnings:close_nodes:vertices Regards Bernard. |
| 105251616 | over 4 years ago | Some good amendments, but the area is already tagged as park and green so landuse=village_green is not appropriate. Only a formal name should go in the name= tag. I've amended to suit. Regards Bernard. |
| 105251431 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. A beach or should be mapped as an area not a node (a single point is referred to as a node inOSM). Please see:- natural=beach As a node only the beach is not recognized as a feature. Please be careful not to disrupt the other features that the node is part of. Regards Bernard. |
| 105234926 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've removed the multipolygon relation for the 5 houses reverting the addresses. Retagged Way: 119472447 as a track, as it is used by vehicles for agricultural access. I've amended the pharmacy tagging to OSM practice, amenity=pharmacy implies a building and there's no need for two pharmacy tags. Regards Bernard. |
| 105232065 | over 4 years ago | Hello Neil, Please be advised that OSM is a live worldwide database from which lots of maps are compiled. As such the data you've added will now be downloaded by map makers. Thus the data should if possible conform to current OSM best practice, and not include duplicated data. Please see:- osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element You could map your project using OSM saving it offline without uploading it. The mapping of plaques is outlined here:- memorial=plaque and gives some good information. There's a site called Open Plaques here:- osm.wiki/Open_Plaques which looks like it links to OSM data. Regards Bernard. |
| 105232065 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you explain what it is you're trying to do please? Most of the objects/features you added in this and previous changesets are already mapped to OSM. If an object needs correcting or amending it's OSM practice to make changes to the original object. Regards Bernard. |
| 105180742 | over 4 years ago | Fiction removed. |
| 102886493 | over 4 years ago | Hi, If the roundabout is open to the public then the construction=secondary tag should be removed. Regards Bernard. |
| 102886675 | over 4 years ago | Hi, I've reverted these changes as they amended the definitive and legal route of the PRoW. I added your route around the field edge. The public route is as depicted on the County's definitive map and accompanying statement. Regards Bernard. |
| 105170167 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your website link isn't valid. Regards Bernard. |
| 105154402 | over 4 years ago | Hi, You can easily see what was changed by looking at the three ways below. I added a description to a path, amended another path and a grass area. The large changeset area was inadvertent. Regards Bernard. |