By the way it is not allowed to use data directly from Ordnance Survey maps as they are protected by copyright. You can use the OS map to walk the path then draw the path from your experience. There are also other maps/data that OSM is allowed to use.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

"Footpath" isn't the formal name for this highway rather footpath is a highway description or status. I've removed the name and added more tags to the way. I've joined the path to the track at north.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Could you please say on what authority you determine the parish church grounds not to be accessible to the public? I assume by your removal of the churchyard footpath that you determine the grounds not accessible to parishioners as well, and can you say under what authority or declaration you assume this. You've even removed the path to the sports field.

Even if the grounds are "private property and not for public access" that is no reason to remove them from the OSM database. In fact, almost all land in the UK is owned and therefore private, even public footpaths. With your present reasoning, nothing should appear on OSM.

I've therefore reinstated the paths.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, can you describe the route of the track indicating the cross overs, please? Maybe even a picture or drawing? I can then try to draw it properly. At the moment it is self-intersecting.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You somehow mapped lots of highways that duplicated the existing highways. I think I've removed all the duplicates.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, you've got Way: The Caterpillar (925898792) crossing over itself and one join in the track. Rides like this should be a single line which is then sectioned up and tagged with relevant layer values. Have a look at similar features to see how it's done.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You did actually request a review.

I was trying to point out that the data was presented incorrectly (not to OSM practice), and could have been improved with better tagging. Thus served no purpose to OSM.

Yes, I knew the website was active, but the web address was presented incorrectly. The correctly presented address https://harkforward.co.uk/ gives vital extra data to show it links to a secure site. The https stands for Hypertext Transfer Protocol over Secure Socket Layer.

I've now amended the POI data adding the address and correct website.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, no response so I've reverted all 5 changesets that contain data not to OSM practice, this in my 102170973.

If you need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, for Way: 857506902 probably a better tag to suit the purpose is surface=grass which is rendered, landcover=grass is not rendered.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, you seem to be making a lot of duplicate nodes. About 10 around Summerstown, I think I've removed them all.

Regards Bernard.

Added layer=1 to the bridges.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your additions to OSM look very strange and make no sense as drawn and tagged. As such they should be amended or deleted as soon as possible. I wonder if you are trying to mark property you have for sale? If so this is not the right place to do this, OSM is a live worldwide database from which thousands of maps are compiled.

Could you explain what you wish to add to OSM, perhaps I can help. Please respond ASAP.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, my point would be that the tag building=terrace should logically refer to a row of houses. These individual houses, (in a terrace), ought to be tagged building=house. The tag house=terraced could also be added to indicate the house type. I think this method is best/easiest.

Please see here for more info:- building=terrace
and here:- house=terraced

Regards Bernard.

Hi, if this is not now the council offices please amend the tags to
disused:name=Moray Council Access Point and disused:
office=government. Thus other folk will know whats happened.

I've removed duplicated section of path and tweaked paths and steps.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There's no real address and the website address is corrupted so the POI has no value. At least a correct website would be good.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The lodge name is tagged so will display the name when the map tiles are re-rendered. The other block has no name. I had assumed that the tag addr:housename=1-20 Farthing Fields (being neither a name or proper address), was supposed to be addr:housenumber=1-20
addr:street=Farthing Fields. Thus with these tags 1-20 will be displayed. Does the block have a proper name?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I changed the name to description as it's not a name.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've made amendment to the address to conform to OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Correct into two buildings and square up barns

I've repositioned several sections of the stream, reversed the direction of two sections, and joined up correctly.