I moved this house off of the stream and squared it up.
Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If you zoom in (with te iD editor) you will be able to draw houses much more accurately. There is also a facility to square up building outlines. I've corrected this one.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Way: Tum Hill Circular (922847687) was placed on top of existing highways.

Way: Tum Hill Circular Walk (922847370) was placed partly on top of a river and part over existing highways.

Please be aware that Public Footpath FP183 is not the name. It's the council reference

Hi I've removed two ways that duplicated the single existing way.

Hi, I've removed the path as it duplicates an existing one. If a way needs correcting or amending please do the correction to the existing way so as to keep the ways data history.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The tag for this situation would be disused:name=Fairlawn Nursery, I've made the change. Is the school still in operation? Do you know the new name? If it's not now used the tags should be amended to disused:amenity=school and disused:building=school on the school building.

Regards Bernard.

The above relates to features with only lane tags as well.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Adding objects to OSM with only a name tag is actually meaningless to the OSM database. These objects are not recognised and will not be rendered on a map.

Please take a little time to read and understand how to map, this is easily done via the help button above right.

If you are not able to correct the mistakes in all your changesets I'll try to make corrections later.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, I've removed the fictional motorway you added to OpenStreetMap. I'm sure you didn't intend to deliberately corrupt the OSM database. Could you therefore please try not to upload unverifiable features. Thanks!

Regards Bernard.

I quite agree with you, it was a mistake and I said sorry. I again apologise and state that I am sorry.

I don't understand how you can consider my saying I'm sorry to folk is an act that "needlessly notified them". If I make a mistake I always accept it and say sorry, it's being polite.

I am now sorry that I might have further offended you, May I please say sorry.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Sorry about that but only five clicks would show you what's been changed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, This is not a building so I've removed the building tag. It looks like a lorry parking area, so I've tagged it as such. If you have better data please amend it to correctly describe the area.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
your new Way: 922369815 tagged as building=yes is not a building. It is a residential area with many buildings in it. It is already within a drawn residential area so I've deleted it as duplication of a residential area, Perhaps you could zoom in and draw the individual buildings. I've squared up the other buildings so they look neater.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've tweaked the residential outlines to better reflect what's on the ground and unjoined them from highways. Tidied up highways, some were duplicated. I'm not sure you highways classifications are correct. If in doubt just tag as unclassified, they can be amended later by someone with correct, preferably on the ground, data.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Are you sure that path is permissive access to pedestrians? It seems to go from a public highway to a publicly accessible park/recreation ground.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, no response so I've corrected the problems by removing duplicates and unjoin from railway line.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Any chance of correcting these duplicated sections of highways? They could well be disrupting routing. Just say if you need help.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've made a few little mistakes here. The Way: Foot Tunnel (919434497) is placed on top of Way: 191509235 making a duplicated highway, they are joined together but tagged as differing layers. Both of these ways are then joined to the railway by a level crossing. A tunnel should not join to a feature above or below it, except at its endpoint.

I've not corrected the problems so that you can see them. If you wish I can easily make corrections. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.