Hi, I've looked at all the course features you've mapped mainly because several self-intersections and duplicated nodes were reported. Don't worry though I've corrected all those problems.

I've also joined the paths where they overlapped or not quite joined. Regarding the path tagging, golf=path is really not needed and is not rendered. The tag highway=path is rendered. I wonder if you meant these ways to be indicated as cart/buggy paths, if so golf=cartpath, golf_cart=designated, highway=path would be appropriate. If the cart path is on a service way then use highway=service.

Regards Bernard.

Hi. I've amended a few footpaths and removed highways (paths) placed atop of other highways (roads).

Hi, I've removed a few duplicated ways. When a public footpath is on the same line as another highway please amend the existing way to accommodate both statuses.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed your 1000 metre long gate. Could place it as a single node on the track in the same manner as other gates in the area. The gate can be tagged to describe the type of access through it. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

May I suggest looking at this link:- leisure=golf_course It will help you to tag golf course features to OSM best practice. I've made a few tweaks to the features you've already made.

If you need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Apologies entirely my fault but not intentional, my attention was called elsewhere and I forgot to upload.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Deleting a feature also deletes the mapping history of the feature. Thus I've reinstated the original building, ( removing your new one). Then amending the original building line so that all the prior history is maintained.

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This looks like an online business, if there is no physical presence of the company at this location it should not be mapped to OSM. All features on OSM must be verifiable on the ground.

Why not map the location of the business as per your website?

Regards Bernard.

Bridge added to a path that you joined to a stream.

Duplications have started again, I just removed part of the footpath Way: 8121427 which you placed on top of an existing highway. Please stop doing this

Hi I removed the path section that the bridge highway replaces.

Hi, I've removed the section of path placed on top of the bridge because it causes duplication of the footway.

I've remove access=no from footpaths.

Hi, I've sectioned off the foot accessible section tagging it access by foot and agricultural.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I think this is a Public Footpath so there would be designated foot access rather than access=no. So I've removed the access=no tag.

You placed part of the path and part of a track on top of each other. So I've removed the duplicate section of the pathway.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreeMap.
Are these features really cooling towers or perhaps storage tanks like others on this site?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the post box collection times to OSM practice. Please use this form in future, Thanks.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've reverted/removed your fiction, you used the wrong tags anyway.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
These POI don't really look like apartments, definitely not the ones placed in the car park area. Were you trying to map the houses? Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, thanks for correcting the terrain. Now the track needs to be correctly aligned, unjoined from the grass area outline and connected to the highway Way: 25333615 at the west end.

Regards Bernard.

It is OSM good practice that when corrections are needed they are done to existing ways. Please do not delete existing ways redrawing them in order to introduce modifications. In doing so you delete all the historical record of the existing way.

In these deletions, you've inadvertently deleted the history of original contributors, the dates, mapping editors used, positions of nodes, the imagery used, tags and placement of nodes. As it is now the history has gone forever.

I had originally thought your fixme tag was on test or temporary lines to assist mapping. Seeing now what has happened I think it would be good to revert these deletions, reinstating the original mapping. The original line (that hold the fixme tags) can be amended and your replacement lines removed. This would reinstate the historical record and be in keeping with OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.