Hi,

In drawing the massive farmland area Way: 851901419 (which actually is not all farmland so is incorrect), you inadvertently self intersected and dragged a section of Way: Swaffham Road (539686138) out of alignment. Thus disrupting correct routing of the highway A1122. No problem now though, I spotted the mistake and have corrected it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, very pleased to hear from you thanks.

I don't think it's possible to revert with the iD editor so I've fully reverted both changesets with JOSM editor (which is fairly easy). Everything is back as it was before your edits so you can carry on.

The note about copyright infringement is here:- osm.org/copyright

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I just wanted to let you know that it is not OK to use Ordnance Survey data to map in OSM. Ordnance Survey data is copyright material. You would be advised to revert these two changesets and start again. Mapping from your on the ground survey and on-site signage.

Regards Bernard

Looks OK.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, There seems to be an anomaly here:-osm.org/#map=19/51.49758/-0.17337&layers=N
You have, from Exhibition Road, Way: 851362858 (no layer tag so it's implied as layer=0) joining to Way: 851362859 (tunnel tagged as layer=-1) which joins to Way: 851362857 (bridge tagged layer=1). The bridge (layer=1) is connected in the middle to the private service road layer=0. Half of the bridge layer=1 also has Way: 851362860 layer=0 joined to it. Way: 851362860 is also joined to the private road and the tunnel.

I can't see from the imagery how the layout should be, perhaps you could please look at this.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Way: 851250894 is untagged.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, You could split the way so the tag "temporary:access=no" can be put on the closed sections also tag with note**=* giving a brief reason for placing the no access tag. Please remember to go back and remove the temp tags later on.

If you need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It seems there is an anomaly here, you've got Matcham Court and Candish Court drawn on top of the Quadrangle building.

Could you have a look and remedy please? If you need help please just ask in this comment section.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've removed the Primark POI as it duplicates the data on the mapped building outline.
By the way, I think you got the number wrong.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've aligned the golf course outline to better merge with adjacent areas and un-joined power line from golf course features.

Hi, Please see here:- golf=cartpath to understand that a cartpath is a linear feature and should not be drawn as an area. Zoom in to the ones you've added and you will see the grass rendered in the center of each of your paths.

Also as I said before, please see here for a guide on golf course features tagging:- leisure=golf_course

If you need help pleas just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've adjusted the building outline to the actual building rather than the whole premises.
Added the website.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You seem to have drawn the outline of probably a garden and tagged it as a house. Could you please have a look to remedy this.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Features added to the OSM database must be verifiable to everyone and not include personal or fictional data. I've amended your tagging to what I think you probably meant and in a manner acceptable to OSM. I've drawn in the five houses perhaps you could put the address on the correct house, (or tell me and I'll do it).

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You somehow dragged a hedge and field outline into the sea. No problem though I've returned them.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just wanted to let you know that someone deleted your new POI because it duplicated an already existing POI.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've modified your tagging of the footpath to suit established OSM practice. Footpath 91 is a public right of way reference not a formal name.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There is already a speed camera tagged as a node (Node: 3460438800) close to your new one. Neither are tagged as per OSM practice, please see:- highway=speed_camera
I'm not local so can't specifically advice how to tag but could you possibly look to rectify the problem.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've tagged this junction as a turning loop. please see:- highway=turning_loop It does not seem to meet the criteria for a turning loop. I can't see any imagery that shows there is a roundabout either.
I've therefore removed the tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A few observations of your new mapping.

It's usual for a highway=path to be mapped as a lineal rather than an area feature, with a width if desired. An area highway should be tagged as area:highway=path, but in these circumstances this would be unusual. Better that paths highways are linear features.

Please see here for a guide on golf course features tagging:- leisure=golf_course
The greens and fairways are features of the course and as such are classed as an amenity rather than a landuse so the surface=grass tag is used to describe grass areas. Landuse=grass is usually an area used to grow a crop of grass, natural=grass is an area that usually grass is allowed to grow naturally, a meadow. Grass on a golf course is managed usually to facilitate the sport.

Regards Bernard.