Hi. I moved the garden off of the building.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Features added to OSM must be factual on the ground and verifiable to everyone. It seems from description and name tags that the feature is only proposed and awaiting permission. If this is the situation then appropriate tags for now would be proposed:crop=tamarilllo (without capital letter),
proposed:landuse=farmland,
proposed:name=St. Francis Food Forest.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please be careful not to duplicate paths, I've just remove three duplicate sections. Two were paths drawn atop of bridges (a bridge is a highway same as the path), and path atop path at the church.
I also moved/unjoined the path from the lake outline, (the path line is the highway centerline drawn atop the lake outline means the path is half in the water).

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
This section of path you've added, Way: Southdowns Way (854341107), is placed atop of existing highways and as such is duplication, (path on top of road). The route Southdowns Way, both hiking:-relation/77976 and mtb:-relation/5881, is mapped utilising the existing highways.
I've removed the duplication highway.

If you could have a look at those routes you'll see how they are made up from existing sections of highways.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Like the oneway=no, covered=no is implied by it's absence. Thus these two negative tags are not needed here.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just wanted to let you know that in the absence of tag oneway=no OSM usually takes it that there is not a oneway restriction. Thus it's not necessary to tag a highway with oneway=no except in special circumstances, which this is not.

Regards Bernard

Hi, I've removed a duplicated section of path. Regards Bernard.

OK no response and no correction so I've amended it as best I can from imagery.
Regards Bernard.

OK, area now tagged.

Hi, Also a section looks like duplication very close to Stawell Road. There were some untagged nodes dotted about, I think I've removed all of them.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, It looks like you've got several sections of Escaile Road duplicated.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
I want to let you know that you've inadvertently joined Way: 853752169 (level=1) to Way: 853752170 (level=0) at several nodes, also Way: 853751380 (level=1) is joined to Way: 853752170 (level=0).
Regards Bernard.

Hi,
You've placed a highway (footpath) atop an existing highway (service). Thus duplicating a highway at the single position.
I've removed the duplicate (path) and amended the tags on the existing highway to positively allow foot use.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
You've placed a highway (footpath) atop an existing highway (service). Thus duplicating a highway at the single position.
I've removed the duplicate (path) and amended the tags on the existing highway to positively allow foot use.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
You've placed a highway (footpath) atop an existing highway (service). Thus duplicating a highway at the single position.
I've removed the duplicate (path) and amended the tags on the existing highway to positively allow foot use.

Regards Bernard.

Thanks Clive.

Hi Welcome top OpenStreetMap.

Are you sure it's a oneway section or have the bus routes changed? The reason I ask is that three of the bus routes using this highway section indicate operating two way through here.

Regards Bernard

Hi, You are welcome to add genuine features to OSM but please don't add website addresses which are not relevant to the object.
I've removed the two websites.
Regards Bernard.

I also removed woods from extending across the trunk road A47, a very dangerous hazard for vehicles.

Hi, I've removed the self intersection of Way: 852160460
Regards Bernard