OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
85828537 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please see here :-highway=road regarding ways tagged as highway=road, this is regarded as a temporary tag.

Anyway I think all these ways that you've tagged as highway=road are in fact dry stream beds not highways at all. Would you like to amend the tags please.

Regards Bernard.

85678100 over 5 years ago

Hi, You've got two areas Way: 807715598 and Way: 807738173 on top of and overlapping each other, both are tagged as level=0. This does not seem logical.
Way: 807740917 also tagged as level=0, also is placed in part over the other level=0 areas.
There are also self intersections on these ways.

Could you please correct these problems.

Regards Bernard.

85788482 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I noticed several of your paths did not join up the the next path/road to them, also one path was atop of an existing path. I've corrected these problems as best I can but please check and if there are anomalies make amendments.

Regards Bernard.

85793881 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The rec name is already on the rec outline so no need to duplicate it.

Regards Bernard.

85771457 over 5 years ago

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've tagged the area with landuse=allotments and remove allotments=plot, this is the OSM recognised tag to render such an area.

Regards Bernard.

85742072 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The city address tag here would be addr:city=Market Rasen, the city address is not Faldingworth.

Regards Bernard.

85695098 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Disconnected the path from administrative boundary and removed the two unneeded nodes from the boundary line.

I disconnected the bridleway (KA18) from the railway above. Removed the section joining to Hartwell Road, and tweaked the existing section of service road as that is the bridleway. (It's OSM practice to amend existing ways rather than add duplicates.) Also tweaked the bridleway tagging to OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

85657740 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

From reading the link to the information there appears to be some through access for emergency vehicles. Thus the highway ought not be tagged motor_vehicle=no

I would suggest the bollard be mapped and tagged as barrier=bollard
bollard=removable
emergency=designated. The motor_vehicle=no tag can then be removed as the bollard will limit the permitted access.

Regards Bernard.

85629756 over 5 years ago

Reinstated footpath.

85561137 over 5 years ago

Hi Peter, Everyone's new to start with, some like me are still learning after many years.

As you can imagine there are a great many different features in OSM. Not everything can be rendered but names usually are. A large number of POI have icons but even then not every one is rendered, (unless you render your own map). I've added building=yes to the bandstand, it now renders in the OSM standard layer with the name.

For the gates, I'm pretty sure gate names are not rendered. Are the gates formally named or is the name particular to the area?

Regards Bernard.

85561137 over 5 years ago

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
When a polygon area is drawn for a feature then a POI with identical tagging is not needed. To place the additional POI in order to make a map appear better is not the proper thing to do, it's called mapping/tagging for the renderer, please see osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

I've removed the POI.

Regards Bernard.

85331233 over 5 years ago

Hi, You duplicated a footpath, the existing path was difficult to see as the park boundary line was drawn atop of it. I've removed the duplicate an redrawn the paths and park as best I can. They're at least all now visible on the map.

Regards Bernard.

85410263 over 5 years ago

I forgot to say making so many edits in one changeset is not a very good idea. I something goes wrong it's very difficult to pinpoint and correct the problem. You were warned in this changeset about crossing highways over highways and buildings over highways. To now find and correct these errors is difficult.

Regards Bernard.

85410263 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You placed your new path Way: 805841193 on top of living street Way: 568580767 thus making a duplicate highway. Please amend existing features rather than adding duplications.
I've removed the duplicate highway for you and amended the existing highway with the wheelchair tag.

Regards Bernard.

85490541 over 5 years ago

Hi welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please amend the existing highway rather than drawing a new one on top of the existing. I've removed the duplicate and placed your new tag on the existing way.

Regards Bernard.

85387178 over 5 years ago

Hi, Are you sure you've got this right? The house on the corner is number 94, should this be the garage or has there been an extension built?

Regards Bernard.

83670607 over 5 years ago

Hi, I see the way Rhodfa Morgannwg (792725403, v1) has been changed to a track and the bus guideway tag removed, it's also now in two sections. As this way goes across fields and is on top of some other highways I wonder if it really exists. Could you shed some light on the situation please?

I would like to remedy the duplicated highways and seek confirmation of the cross-field sections

Regards Bernard

85328082 over 5 years ago

OK many thanks for the info.

85328082 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I wonder, do you now for sure that the building has been demolished? Or are you assuming this because you can't see it on Esri imagery? The building was there and the shadow of the pitched roof can be seen.

Regards Bernard.

85159722 over 5 years ago

Hi, My apologies I had thought I had joined the path to the road a few days ago. On looking just now the path was still not joined to the road. It is now and I've double checked. I don't know for sure but I don't think the path was previously joined to the road.

Regards Bernard.