Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I made a few amendments mainly to confirm to OSM practice. May I refer you to the county definitive map for info on path designations and routes at https://tinyurl.com/y8vvhm42

I also removed Crows Nest Dingle, which was duplication (wood within wood) and your personal data

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Sorry I didn't realise you were making amendments to the problems.

I've already removed the part of your new path, (Way: 813584762) that was placed on top of way/103560825 duplicating it. So your duplication cannot now be seen.
It's a similar situation at way/74143531.

On now checking the area I see your new Way: 802294781 is joined to the admin boundary line instead of Shepherd's Lane. I've not amended this so that you can see the problem.

May I say that a lot of contributors are trying to make prow_ref tagging consistent across the country. Please see :- osm.wiki/User:Rjw62/PRoW_Tagging
Such as Parish Name, Type Code (FP, BR, RB, BY), Number. The authority number if if in a different format can be placed in the ref tag. So for example prow_ref=Chorleywood FP 30
ref=CW30

I think with joining the path onto Shepherd's Lane these problems are corrected.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
You've made a lot of duplicated highways by placing a new highway on top of an existing way, please see here :-https://tinyurl.com/y9zlrvj3

If a way needs amending or correcting please amend or correct the existing way. You also ought not delete the existing way to draw a new way in it's place as this destroys the history of the existing way.

If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,

I cannot find that a Definitive Map Modification Order (DMMO) has been made. If you are aware that one exists could you please show where, thanks?

The way is not changed to a bridleway until a DMMO is legally made. So I've reverted the way back to bicycle=no and highway=footway. I've also removed the path names as they are not formal names merely references as tagged.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, the advice is to use surface=grass on golf courses, not landuse=grass, (the use of the land is not to grow a crop of grass).

I see you added back landuse=grass, so areas have two grass tags. I've again the landuse tags adding surface=grass to the new areas.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You had your river flowing the wrong way, I've corrected it.

It's best not to have change-sets over a large area, this one extended from the UK across Europe then over Africa nearly to the Congo.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This link might help point to OSM best practice for adding golf features :-leisure=golf_course

I've made quite a few tweaks to the features in this changeset, as I thought it easier to amend rather than explain each item. You did drag some existing areas out of alignment.

May I also suggest fewer changes in any one changeset, if mistakes are then made it will be easier to locate them (by yourself or someone else).

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately your changes have only resulted in some duplication of existing highway lines. I think you were trying to show foot access on some service roads. Rather than draw a new highway it's OSM practice to amend/adjust existing features (the service roads). In this instance in a park and with footpaths joining onto the service road it will be taken that there is foot access to the service road.
Thus I've reverted this changeset, I did also amend a couple of anomalies.

Would you like help with contributing to OSM?
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
From your changeset comment above and available imagery I assume the footpaths are on the ground. I also assume your deleting the footpaths was inadvertent. Thus I've reinstated the footpaths and added more.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just wanted to point out that foot is a designated form of access to a public bridleway, so I've reinstated the foot=designated tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

No need for a point ans an area so I've put all data on the area and removed the poi.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The complete details for Lidl supermarket are already on the building outline so your new POI is unneeded duplication of data. Thus I've removed the POI.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Is that the real name or is it a Jet Wash.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Proper/formal names are usually each word capitalised, I've capitalised these for you.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The street name (addr:street=Canning Street) is actually held in the Associated Street Relation :-relation/2755307

So no need for it on individual features in the relation. But it's doing no harm except a little bloat of the OSM database.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've looked at all your edits and they're pretty good. I did make quite a few tweaks, moved areas off of highway center lines, squared up a few buildings , added pool and play area. also made quite a few amendments to the general area.

Regards Bernard.

Removed duplicate sections of highway

Hi,
You inadvertently dragged lots of features out of place. I've reverted this changeset to reinstate the features dragged out of alignment.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

review_requested Pretty good.

Regards Bernard

Hi, With respect the points duplicate data held on the house outline, if the building polygon is drawn all data pertaining to it should be placed on the polygon (and if it is isolated=??? that tag should go on the polygon as well).
But Westfield and Grasmere are part of Faldingworth village so are not truly isolated places or dwellings.

Regards Bernard.