Hi, You duplicated a footpath, the existing path was difficult to see as the park boundary line was drawn atop of it. I've removed the duplicate an redrawn the paths and park as best I can. They're at least all now visible on the map.

Regards Bernard.

I forgot to say making so many edits in one changeset is not a very good idea. I something goes wrong it's very difficult to pinpoint and correct the problem. You were warned in this changeset about crossing highways over highways and buildings over highways. To now find and correct these errors is difficult.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You placed your new path Way: 805841193 on top of living street Way: 568580767 thus making a duplicate highway. Please amend existing features rather than adding duplications.
I've removed the duplicate highway for you and amended the existing highway with the wheelchair tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please amend the existing highway rather than drawing a new one on top of the existing. I've removed the duplicate and placed your new tag on the existing way.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Are you sure you've got this right? The house on the corner is number 94, should this be the garage or has there been an extension built?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I see the way Rhodfa Morgannwg (792725403, v1) has been changed to a track and the bus guideway tag removed, it's also now in two sections. As this way goes across fields and is on top of some other highways I wonder if it really exists. Could you shed some light on the situation please?

I would like to remedy the duplicated highways and seek confirmation of the cross-field sections

Regards Bernard

OK many thanks for the info.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I wonder, do you now for sure that the building has been demolished? Or are you assuming this because you can't see it on Esri imagery? The building was there and the shadow of the pitched roof can be seen.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, My apologies I had thought I had joined the path to the road a few days ago. On looking just now the path was still not joined to the road. It is now and I've double checked. I don't know for sure but I don't think the path was previously joined to the road.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Rob,
Using Google map data even derived data infringes Googles copyright. So it's best not to even mention Google when mapping to OSM.
I can see the western half is asphalt, I've tagged that half bicycle=yes, foot=yes, highway=service, surface=asphalt which I think is correct. The eastern half looks like a farm track, I've tagged it foot=yes, highway=track, tracktype=grade4
Track-types are described here :-tracktype=*

I hope this helps, please feel free to amend the tags to your knowledge bearing in mind that tags should reflect ground truth and be verifiable.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please don't make changes to the OSM database to suit your own purposes. Features added to or amended on OSM must be verifiable.

At least part of the way you tagged as grass is asphalt,and at least part is a route with public access, bicycle.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Owen,

I've removed the name, I had thought you meant it as a name.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I removed the seemingly inadvertent tag ford=yes from your new track.
Regards Bernard.

Looking further another section of track Way: 792725403 is also drawn in part on top of existing highways and seemingly across fields.

Hi, I was wondering why Way: 803319027 is drawn across fields , woods and a stream where the imagery shows no sign of the track? It's also in part drawn directly on top of a footpath, Way: 27643475. Has the track been newly created, is it a new cycleway?

Curious Bernard.

Hi, I've amended the tags on the garden to OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You somehow created or left some untagged unneeded lines and polygons,
Way: 803511982, Way: 803511973, Way: 803511961, Way: 803511962 in this area. I've deleted them as that seemed easier than explaining to you exactly where they were. Please have regard to errors and/or warnings when uploading.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It's likely the road is not a public highway but it was not described as such. It certainly is shown on imagery. Does it exist as a service road through a gate to a storage area? Or maybe the area has been developed and the road removed? If it exists in some form it is a valid feature for OSM. Could you please comment?

Regards Bernard

A building polygon should outline the building not the residential area that is landuse. I've reduced the building to the building outline.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, your cycleways are duplicating existing highways thus with one highway on top of another routeing is difficult if not impossible.

I have removed the cycleway lines and the fictional bridge. Please take a while to learn how to properly add features to OSM, there is usually a way do almost everything.

Regards Bernard.