Hi, it looks like your use of the level tag is somewhat astray. The level tag is used to show a particular level with regard to other levels, it is not a tag with which to define height or relevant height. Please see building:levels=*

If this is a bungalow then the level tags would be building:levels=1, roof:levels=1.
Heights would be tagged separately, guidance for heights please see here osm.wiki/Simple_3D_buildings

Regards Bernard

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A couple of your buildings were joined together. I've un-joined them and terraced them into individual houses.

Regards Bernard.

Hi welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It looks like these buildings are of three levels, ground floor (level=0), first floor (level=1) and second floor (level=2), so the tag should be building:levels=3

Please see level=*

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

several of your tags will not be recognised by OSM so I've added them to a description tag. I also added the website.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, this looks like six houses not a single house.

Hi, This feature is already within a mapped residential area and buildings are not usually tagged as landuse=residential, As this is building a better tag would be building=residential. Please be aware though that this is not a single building but two and each building contains four houses. If you need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Could you please say your information comes from that leads to the tagging leisure=park
name=Beechwood Park for this area, I cannot find any reference to indicate this? Please remember to data added to OSM must be verifiable to all, please see osm.wiki/Verifiability

I have added back the surface=grass tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I removed your grass area (Way: 684444058) from across a road and bridge. The field does not extend across the highway, please be more careful regarding this sort of situation.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You placed the building data on every node as well as building outlines. I've removed the data placed on the building nodes as its unnecessary multiple duplication of data.

Regards Bernard

My apologies I overlooked the layer tag, yes that's correct. I've squared up the whole block and tied in Powerid. Very good mapping.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You now have a building within a building (MPA Enterprises inside of CJ's Bowling) also these two buildings overlapping a third building, Poweroid.

I've not made any amendments so you can see the problem and hopefully rectify it.

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've removed the area.

Hi F4s0WRt, you are quite correct, just highway=service on the ways to the parking_aisle then both tags highway=service
service=parking_aisle on the actual parking_aisle I've amended the parking lot just north of East Davis Drive.

Regarding the parking lot around way number 684969735. That's now wrong in a different manner, it looks like you've tried to draw a polygon around the blocks of parking spaces. You would only normally draw the actual ways you would drive around the car park, not the blocks of parking spaces. I've amended this one so please have a look again. (I think these areas look a lot neater and are more correct if they're squared up, I think it can be done in the iD editor

You can also draw the outline perimeter of the parking lot. And give this outline the name of the parking lot.

Regards Bernard

Hi, I found Esri beta imagery to be the clearest here. I've made a few amendments and additions as per the imagery. I sectioned the ways so that they could be squared up.

Just ask if you need any help, Regards Bernard

Hi F4sOWRt, if a particular highway is not joined to the whole highway network it is considered by routers to be an island, (cut off from all other highways as it were). I think your parking aisles are joined to other highways if not how could you drive onto them.

If you are on one of your not joined to the network parking aisles, how do you get out of the car park. You've not provided a way.

Routing software would not be able to guide you from within the car park to somewhere outside of the car park because there is no way.

You're right though in that there seems to be no reference to a highway network so I hope this explanation suffices.

Regards Bernard.

Hi F4sOWRt, do you think you could go back and repair/correct the parking aisles you've already added please? Self intersecting and not even joined to the highway network, as such they are really of no value to OSM.

Regards Bernard

Hi James,
I wonder now if you are referring to the fixed point Node: 470598344 (restriction no right turn), which is tagged except=psv;motorcycle;bicycle. This point would be more like you describe as a bus gate rather than the linear section of highway under the bridge.

Regards Bernard.

Hello James, Thanks for the explanation. I've added the priority tag, (and un-joined the highway from the bridge structure).

As the two tags 'Bus Gate' and 'Private Hire', nor any variation of them, are valid or recognised by OSM they will be ignored by OSM and, as far as I know, be ignored by routeing software. It does no harm to leave them though.

As for the busgate being for a fixed point, this is actually a length of carriageway. The busgates that are described on the web are on fixed points, (where a bus has to pass across another carraigeway, there are traffic lights to control that fixed point of crossover). Are there traffic lights here to control the length of carriageway as if it were a fixed point?

I added your comment to the tagging (in a note and description) so others can see your statement when/if editing the map.

Regards Bernard.

path reinstated

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The tagging keys 'Bus Gate' and 'Private Hire' are not valid/recognised by OSM.

The way was already tagged with psv=yes which would allow bus traffic. Tagging the way simply as access=yes, motor_vehicle=no means that all transport modes except motor vehicles can use the element. Actually as the way was originally tagged the access=yes tag is not necessary.

Your Private Hire=no tag seems to say taxis are not allowed but the way is tagged taxi=yes. I thought if psv traffic is allowed then usually taxi traffic is allowed.

Lastly is there a priority direction for traffic through here? Pictures on the web suggest yes.

Regards Bernard.