Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Children aren't allowed onto railway land to play so I've moved your playground into Broadhurst Gardens.

Regards Bernard.

No response so I have moved it to where I think it should be. It is definitely no situated here!

I have amended the tagging please see other comments, it needed man_made=pier to be rendered.

Hi, as it was the mooring would not have been rendered, I added man_made=pier, it should now be rendered.

Regards.

Hi, you asked for a review of your edit adding a mooring to the map and to a river relation.

I have removed the tag natural=water as this is meant to describe an enclosed feature, your's is a linear feature.

I added the website that links to the GOBA list and map of moorings. When all the moorings are added to OSM the web link can be to OSM.

I amended the description tag value as it was not in the correct format for OSM, (extra spaces are not allowed).

Although it actually does no harm yours is the only instance of a mooring in a river relation. As riverbank is not an approved part of the relation I would not think a mooring is either A river relation is composed of sections making a complete linear feature. Please see osm.wiki/Relation:waterway
I would therefore suggest the mooring be removed from the relation, one would not normally look there for moorings.

Regards Bernard

Hello again, I've found more information about the path and have updated the database. My apologies for being a bit misleading. The area of Wiveton Downs is Open Access Land on foot only. There is also permissive access as a bridleway specifically on the route you added, horses are not allowed off of that way onto the downs.
http://cwr.naturalengland.org.uk/mapboards/pdfs/AG00307815.pdf
Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The tags leisure=park and name=Tavener Fields Park are on the park boundary line. Your addition is therefore an inadvertent duplication so I've removed it.

Please don't let this put you off mapping though, if I can help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I also see you've inadvertently removed section's of track and right of way footpath.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, quite a reasonable assumption. The public though has no right in the area except on foot due to the designation of the area as Open Access. The landowner can allow access by other means but this is permissive not a public right. I know that horse riding has been allowed from even before the area was designated as Open Access, but this has always been permitted access.

Regards Bernard

Hi, I've reinstated the highway=path tag because this way is a path trod through the grass, there is no made or maintained footway here just a desire line that is designated as a public_footpath.

Hi, I've removed the fictitious name of Footpath to Wiveton Hall Cafe (footpath is closed over winter). If access to the way is restricted then restriction tags or a note should be added.

Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder if you really meant to describe Way: 659751368 as a bridleway? The public has no right to use this way except on foot as it is an Open Access Area to which public access is on foot only.

You extend the way west of Saxlingham Road, there is only one track here not two as your mapping describes. To the east you end your new way as ending joined to the parish boundary rather than Langham Road.

My view is that this way is a footpath across Wiveton Down which has been used as such for many years.

Regards Bernard.

changeset reverted

Hi, in this changeset I've removed all address tags from building nodes.

Bernard.

I've been through this changeset and removed all addr:city=Rushden and addr:place=Higham Ferrers from building nodes.

I've now found that Changeset: 65093437 has the same problems so I'll now look at that.

Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It looks like your new path named "route" is actually a duplication of existing ways.
A route consisting of several existing ways can be shown with a route relation.
If this route is your personal route then it doesn't belong in OSM. Only ways that are verifiable should be added to OSM.

For the above reasons your changes/additions should be reverted as they disrupt the proper usage of OSM.

There are ways and means that personal paths routes can be recorded both on and offline without disrupting the OSM database.

If you need any help please just ask. I can revert the changes if you wish, which I would do in due course.

Regards Bernard.

Hello RAC_UK,

It looks like you have inadvertently added addr:city=Rushden and addr:place=Higham Ferrers to the nodes of many or all of the buildings in this changeset area. Although no harm is done it does unnecessarily bloat the OSM database.

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I have walked over Hales Green for twenty odd years now (maybe a lot longer), and can assure you that there are tracks through the grass used as desire lines for pedestrian traffic these are called footpaths (paths made by foot). Some lines are also used by animals. There is also a clear line marked by agricultural vehicles, this is also used heavily by foot traffic, thus a path for feet, a footpath.

It is customary in OSM to map what is on the ground and this is what has been done. I also uploaded to OSM the GPS traces of some of my walks. These GPS traces were also used to carefully draw the footpaths. I'm also the person who mapped the public open access so in fact the Green is in effect a very very wide footpath.

I hope you can see your way to revert these changes.
Regards Bernard

Hi, I've made a few amendments i.e. minor path alighnments, separate paths from buildings and areas, remove sidewalk tags from footpaths not associated with a carriageway.

Regards Bernard

Hi, the north section of Way: 32613073 which you tagged horse=no is actually part of the Sotterly horse trail, so horses are allowed by permit on this section of public footpath. At the sewerage works the footpath and horse trail diverge. Please see https://www.sotterleyestate.co.uk/equestrian

Regards Bernard