BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 167965658 | 6 months ago | Self-intersections can be seen here:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-5.27545&lat=50.21307&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way |
| 167965658 | 6 months ago | Hi, Please have a look at this farmland area:- Way: 1408604413. It has several self-intersections, making it not a true outline. I also see narrow margins between land areas, ie between Way: 1408604413 and Way: 1396818871. These areas would join at the common boundary, (usually the hedge line), thus not leaving a narrow margin of undefined land. I usually just correct these problems as I see them, but I've not corrected the above so that you can see what I mean. Regards Bernard. |
| 167963221 | 6 months ago | access=no is incorrect on highways that that do allow some public access it's illogical. I've removed the tags. |
| 167995343 | 6 months ago | Hi, I've reverted the change reinstating the original pitch and add your info to it. Thus all the features history is maintained. I removed the generic name, OSM uses formal verifiable names. Regards Bernard. |
| 167965658 | 6 months ago | Hi, I've removed the untagged Way: 1408604416 because it has self-intersections, is mainly placed on the center line of highways, (land areas don't usually extend to the centerlines of highways). I've previously unjoined several sections of farmland areas from the centerline of tracks. Farm tracks are usually either inside or outside of land areas; land areas don't usually join the centerline of tracks. Regards Bernard. |
| 167952123 | 6 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Replaced a tree to its original position and two area outlines. Corrected spelling of platform. Regards Bernard. |
| 167886139 | 6 months ago | Hi, Access to public footpaths is not permissive, it's a designated right. I've made lots of amendments. Regards Bernard. |
| 167629441 | 6 months ago | Fiction monorail stop tags removed from Node: 286719707 |
| 167918283 | 6 months ago | I've squared up the buildings |
| 167917823 | 6 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've removed '1 Swinley Close' from the name tag as it's not a formal name. Regards Bernard. |
| 167500204 | 6 months ago | Hi, Can you please rectify or remove the stile. |
| 167883400 | 6 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The buildings look much better when squared up, the shortcut to square up is 'Q'. Regards Bernard. |
| 167817293 | 6 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You've added a footpath which is placed on top of an existing highway and is also on top of a building. Such duplication could disrupt routing, thus I've removed it. Unless your route is verifiable as per OSM practice (osm.wiki/Verifiability), it shouldn't be mapped to the OSM database. You can create your own personal map with a route and save it without uploading. Regards Bernard. |
| 160674306 | 6 months ago | No response so tahgged as grass and amend relation |
| 167672639 | 6 months ago | Duplicated highways removed |
| 167629311 | 6 months ago | There were problems with ways with the same position and gaps in hedges were missing. |
| 167629311 | 6 months ago | Hi, Some of the hedge lines were duplicated. |
| 165691739 | 6 months ago | Hi, I see you added layer= tags to houses on West Hill Road. Do you realise that layer=-10 or any minus layer is underground? Thus I've removed the layer=-? tags.
|
| 167499726 | 6 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. These features would be building=yes, not landuse=residential same as the nearby features. I've amended them. |
| 167064372 | 6 months ago | No response so I've reverted changes to 119 Boundary Road and mapped AWM to 12 Boundary Road as per the website. |