Fiction removed and highway placement reinstated.

Hi, Several of your new residential were mapped on top of existing residential areas in very strange shapes. A couple of other areas were dragged out of shape. I've removed the problems, and the map looks OK now.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The tag leisure=park infers a park open to the public for recreation, which I don't think these are. Thus, I've removed those two tags. I've added the tag leisure=dog_park to the POI in the area that looks like the dog park.

Regards Bernard.

Hi. Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunatly you new highways included some that were duplications of existing highways, Way: 1412126937, Way: 1412126936 and Way: 1412126948. I've removed these duplications as they could cause disruption to routing. I've also made several corrections/amendments to NH81, adding bridges etc.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately several sections of your highways were duplicated, which I've now removed. Please don't place a highway section on top of any other highway; it could disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The website link diesn't work, I've removed it.

Fictional bridge removed, Way:1410976204.

Hi, Only formal verifiable names should be used, thus I've removed names.

Also building should not cross over each other. Buildings are better/neater when squared up.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The street address is simply Quebec Way. I've amended.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It is likely that the first mapper of the path was aware that bicycles were not permitted. Also the landowner might not want cycling on their land. Therefore, unless you to definitely know that bicycles are allowed then the tag should remain. Routers don't always work as desired so we should not alter OSM data to try and help them. A good router will not route a bicycle through a bicycle=no tag.

Regards Bernard.

Duplicated highway removed.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There's no point in putting the addresses on every pitch. An appropriate place for an address might be the hall. The names all seem to be fiction. OSM only uses formal, verifiable names not descriptions.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, This path is also a PRoW, tags added.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Yes this one is a Public Footpath, I've added the tags.

Hi, Please stop duplicating existing highways, it could disrupt routing.

If any existing way needs amending or correcting, it's OSM practice to amend or correct the existing way, not just map over it.

Duplicated highway removed.

Regards Bernard.

Duplicated highway removed.

Duplicated highway removed.

Duplicated highway removed.

Duplicated highway removed.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The barracks are already fully mapped with this outline:- Way: Robertson Barracks (107382014), way/107382014

Thus, your new outline is inadvertent duplication, so I've removed it.

Regards Bernard.