Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMao.

I've removed this highway because it duplicates an existing highway. If a feature needs amending it's OSM best practice to amend/correct anty existing feature, not just map it again, thus the feature history is maintained.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The apartment is located in the highway area. Could you tag the address and place it in the appropriate building?

Regards Bernard.

Tagged details to the campsite outline

Hi, I've reinstated the unclasssified status of these highways as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please could you more precisely position the defibrillator so folk can easily find it? At the moment it's inside the building but your tag in inside=no, a bit confusing.

If you explain it's position maybe I could help?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Several problems here with duplication of highways which could cause disruption of routing. I've removed parts of ways: 1353142317, 1353142317, 1353124796, 1353124779, 1353142314, 1353124778 and 1353124784. Also removed ways 1353142318, 1353142319, 1353124780 and 1353124781

Please don't place footways on top of other highways. The existing highway should be amended to any new data thus maintaining history.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, that's a building, not a garden, it may have a garden around it though. I've made an amendment,

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The area can be tagged as both leisure=nature_reserve and natural=wood. I've amended the tags and added a website tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted your deletion of this track because it is a verifiable, ground-truth feature. It has been on the OSM database since 2014. I do not believe that OSM has ever tagged it incorrectly as a cycle path or footpath. It is tagged as private.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I am assuming you are using the OSM front page map to test the routing:- osm.org/directions#map=16/52.15574/0.56439&layers=N. Please first refresh/reload that webpage in your browser. Now paste in the postcodes. For me the three car routing options work as expected going via Malting End. I must admit there is one problem, when reversed the GrapHopper option is incorrect. This points to the GrapHopper either not using up-to-date data or not using the OSM data correctly.

I've now added locked=yes to the gate.

You should now find the same routing as I do. But bear in mind that the delivery problem might still be that Amazon uses the OSM map data incorrectly, disregarding access restrictions in the map data..

Regards Bernard.

Hi Richard, It's good to be able to talk things through. If I may first explain something, OpenStreetMap is not actually a conventional map. It is a licensed open database from which anyone can compile a map. Amazon has its own proprietary mapping software based on OpenStreetMap data, which includes GPS technology supposedly to assist drivers in finding the most efficient routes to customer locations. It is Amazon's incorrect use of OSM data for their routing algorithm that often causes problems. I can assure you that OSM always strives to have verifiable ground truth in its database that, if used properly should cause no trouble.

The track is now tagged with access=agricultural and motor_vehicle=no which means agricultural use only, no other vehicles. I've tagged the gate with access=private
and motor_vehicle=no. These tags properly interpreted mean no vehicles should approach from the A143. Lastly, is the gate locked, if so the tag locked=yes could be added to it?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Mill Road is an unclassified road ref U7063 from the B1063 to the PRoW near the gate. From there to the A143 It is a farm track designated as a Public Footpath. The above information is available on the county definitive map. The names you added are at best unneeded descriptions, definitely not formal names. Thus I've made corrections to reinstate the original data but showing the general access to the track as agricultural.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've relocated the AED positions to more suit your location description. Reason being I did not think they were in the path or road center line.

Regards Bernard.

Fictional motorway removed. Please don't corrupt the OSM database.

Way: 1352277420, Way: 1352277421 are remove as they duplicate existing highways.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the highways Way: 1352277435 and Way: 1352277436, mainly because they duplicate existing highways and that the tag highway=road is not an OSM valid tag. Please tag the appropriate highway status tag, highway=road

Way: 1352277437 and Way: 1352277438 are clearly tracks, I've amended and joined to the highway network.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Many features dragged out of alignment here, I think I've replaced all of them.

Duplicated highway removed.

Hi, Partial revert to reinstate dragged outlines of shops, Beats, Simmons, Oskar.

Reverted to reinstate post box tags.