BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 162219117 | 11 months ago | Fiction name removed, |
| 162145951 | 11 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Several of these highways duplicated existing highways. I've removed the duplicate because they would disrupt routing. Regards Bernard. |
| 162121100 | 11 months ago | Hi, part of the footpath Way: 1356645945 duplicated an existing highway so I've removed that section of footpath. Regards Bernard. |
| 159872995 | 11 months ago | Hi, Just to let you know OSM best practice for Public Rights of Way that have names. Only formal and verifiable names are meant to go in the name tag. The PRoW reference is a reference used by the Highway Authority, it's not a name and should not be added to the name tag. It should go in the prow:ref tag. Thus River Lane should be tagged name=River Lane, prow:ref=Leatherhead BY 145. I've made an amendment here. Regards Bernard. |
| 162032905 | 11 months ago | Hi, There's no such agency on the side of the road just here. The website also suggests no office here. Thus I assume this is fiction and remove the node. If it's somewhere else I may be able to help, just ask here, Regards Bernard. |
| 161977811 | 11 months ago | Hi. I've tweaked your tagging and removed the relation, it's not needed. Regards Bernard. |
| 161973043 | 11 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The OSM database is to record data about on-the-ground verifiable features. It looks like this place, 10 Green Lane is an NHS surgery. The Travel Franchise website does not list this property as it's office. Thus I've removed your test listing node. By all means map genuine Travel Franchise offices. Regards Bernard. |
| 161967320 | 11 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The so called track is actually a highway=service, service=driveway, with access+private. I've amended to suit. Regards Bernard. |
| 161925701 | 11 months ago | Hi, Indoor mapping is extremely complex and your additions don't meet OSM best practice. I think you ought remove these indoor features and perhaps learn the intracies of it first, a search for 'OSM indoor mapping help' would help you. Regards Bernard. You are still duplicating features and now using illogical tags (access=yes, amenity=bench, door=yes, indoor=room on a single feature). |
| 161922694 | 11 months ago | Duplicated building Way: Business Design Centre (1355303925) removed. |
| 161922815 | 11 months ago | Hi, More untagged ways, can they be removed or will you rag them. If they stay they would be better if squared up. |
| 161859943 | 11 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've moved your node to the position indicated on your website, on Maderia Road. Regards Bernard. |
| 161771325 | 11 months ago | Hi, Thanks for drawing my attention here. Yes a mistake on my part in placing part of the tag value in the key. It's a Public Right of Way so the tags are designated=public_footpath
Regards Bernard. |
| 161780508 | 11 months ago | Hi, the definitive map reference for a highway is not the name. Regards Bernard. |
| 161827723 | 11 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I reverted this changeset because it dragged features out of shape, re the warnings above. Regards Bernard. |
| 161606475 | 11 months ago | No response and not enough info to properly position it so removed. |
| 161730553 | 11 months ago | Hi, I've removed Way: 1354046852, as it duplicates the existing highway, I've amended the existing highways. Please check for problems like this before uploading as they would disrupt routing. Regards Bernard. |
| 161730460 | 11 months ago | Ford tag removed from footpath. |
| 161729469 | 11 months ago | Hi, I've removed Way: 1354039317 as it duplicates an existing highway. Regards Bernard. |
| 161751593 | 11 months ago | Hi, I've removed these two highways,
Regards Bernard. |