Hi, Regarding the steps Way: 1305097823. They need to be sectioned up and an appropiate layer tag added to show which step section is above the other. As mapped now all the steps are implied (in the absence of a layer tag) to be at layer=0, ground level.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks for trying but you didn't change it you deleted it. No problem though, I've reinstated the area and tagged it landuse=residential.

Regards Bernard.

Duplicated sections of highways removed.

Duplicated paths removed.

Duplicate paths removed.

Duplicated paths removed.

Hi, You somehow added duplicated footpaths. I've removed the duplications and tweaked the path line to the definitive line as shown on the Highway Authority website. I added the appropriate tags for a PRoW. The crossfield section of path is removed.

The section joining to the roundabout is part of a cycleway route.

I forgot to say OSM only uses formal verifiable names, thus I've removed the name.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM had the highway tagged as a track, third party apps are to blame for your problems. OSM has not implied that the track is a "public footpath/bridleway/permissive path". Your grievance ought to be taken up with apps that lay false claims about access to your track.

I've amended the tags to access=agricultural, foot=no, highway=track, vehicle=private. I've added the gates at each end as well taging them as access=private, barrier=gate, foot=no, vehicle=private. With this tagging OSM would consider there to be no public access whatever.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, A different problem, footpath Way: 1304673213, you've mapped as crossing 2 waterways, the waterways are restrictions to the highway. Are there bridges or fords crossing the waterways?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed several duplicated sections of highway which would have disrupted routing.

If a service road is also a public footpath please do not map the path on top of the road. Rather amend the tagging to the road to show it's dual use, designation=public_footpath
foot=designated
highway=service.

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your contribution to OSM is much appreciated, but, it contains many problems. There are 16 highway warnings given above which should be corrected.

If you could restrict the number of edits in any uploaded changeset to about 10 then it would be much easier for you or any other mapper to see any problems. Correcting these problems would then be easier for everyone.

I've removed a couple of duplicated highways. Also properly joined several other disconnected or crossing paths. I've unjoine several highways from area outlines as per OSM practice. I've amended many vehicle tags.

You tagged the path way:1253004962 as no public access, but this path is part of the route relation King Charles III England Coast Path: Cleveleys to Liverpool. I've removed the access restrictions and tagged it foot=yes. If this path is not now accessible then the route relation should be amended.

Regards Bernard.

Hello Smifff, Just to let you know I've removed all restriction tags so the road should soon be routable in OSM. I've also tagged the priority over the narrow bridge.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If the road is open then the access=no tag should also be removed from all sections. It looks open to me but I'm not local so I can't verify that.

Regards Bernard.

Fiction reverted.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM is a live worldwide database, fiction is not welcome here. Please stop adding fiction and revert the fiction you've already added.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You made several duplicate highways which would disrupt routing.

I've removed the duplicates.

If you limit your changeset to 10 to 20 features instead of nearly 500 you might see the problems you make.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution.

I've unjoined the path line from the landuse (field) outline, as per OSM practice. One question is the footpath formally named or signed and verifiable as per:- osm.wiki/Verifiability ? Or is 'Numbers Farm permissive path' a description. If it is then the name= tag should be changed to osm.wiki/Tag:description=.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, My apologies, it was 9 months ago, I don't know if that Esri image was then available. But you are correct.

I've now added back the construction area as best I can and amended the other areas and service roads. Do you know what the type of construction is?

The addition is made in Changeset: 154424186. Please feel free to revert this changeset if you wish to map the area yourself.

Regards Bernard.