Hi Bagis,

It was 9 months ago I changed a section of Jonstorpsvägen from highway=construction to highway=residential.

I also removed the construction area tagged construction=grass
landuse=construction from within an area tagged landuse=grass.

I can see no ongoing construction work in this area on any imagery. Could you please point out exactly where you see construction work on Esri,

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've tweaked a few things as mentioned above.

Hi, Please be aware of the many warnings given above. I've just remove some duplicated highway that you mapped.

Hi, Another problem. In a few places here you've mapped a footpath on top of a footpath. I've just now removed four such cases of highway duplication. Please be careful as this duplication disrupts routing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've got two number 14 Barleyfields, could you please check the house numbering?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed a few unnecessary park nodes from the park area.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, This platform is already mapped and is in a route relation, this is in the existing platform which you here partially duplicate. Please amend/correct existing mapping rather than drawing over it. Thus I've removed the duplicate.

Regards Bernard.

Removed, as platform 1 alreaddy mapped as relation on other platform line.

No response so I've reinstated this parking node, moved the shop to Hitchen as per website address

Hi, I've reverted this changeset in order to reinstate the platform that was dragged out of it's original shape.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've reverted this changeset in order to reinstate the platform that was dragged out of it's original shape.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed your new bridge Way: 1301823513 as this duplicated a section of existing highway, (possibly disrupting routing). I sectioned up the existing highway and inserted the bridge as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The new path Way: 1301700520 is a duplication of the existing public footpath Way: 175044188, thus I've removed it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your desire to better OSM is much appreciated. However unbeknownst to your good self this sidewalk is already mapped, the sidewalk tag is on the adjacent highway sections. This is a manner to map sidewalks you wouldn't know until you gain more experience.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Reviewing your mapping as requested I can see a few inadvertent mistakes.

The garages are crossing over each other, (warning given above). I think there would only be two garages, one for each house.

The two houses north of the garages look to be semi-detached, so they should be joined at the party wall.

The three other buildings tagged as building=house actually look like three pairs of semi-detached houses. So they are not a single residence, mapped thus the tag should be building=residential. If the building is split forming the two residences then each should be tagged building=house and house=semi-detached could also be added if desired.

If you need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Please be aware of the highway warnings above, the problems can disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.

Please be aware of the highway warnings above, the problems can disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately your mapping dragged a large area of many features out of alignment. Thus I've reverted the changeset. All is now OK.

The ways that you deleted from the OSM database are mostly genuine features that can be seen on the ground via aerial imagery. A lot are also shown as highways on Ordnance Survey maps. Some are actually public highways.

Please don't remove genuine verifiable features from the OSM database.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I think these paths ways are actually paths and should be tagged as such as per OSM guidelines. If they are not open to the public then the correct thing to do is add the tag access=private which indicates that there is no public access whatever, no other restriction tags are necessary.

The ways should not have a description in the name tag, these tags should be changed to description=? Lastly I wonder if you meant the description to indicate bird ringing, rather than bird riging.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The feature you named is not a wall nor is it named The Wall, it is the outline of a private parkland. The sections of the outline that are walls are separately tagged as such. I've removed your tag 'The Wall'.

Regards Bernard.