Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM had the highway tagged as a track, third party apps are to blame for your problems. OSM has not implied that the track is a "public footpath/bridleway/permissive path". Your grievance ought to be taken up with apps that lay false claims about access to your track.

I've amended the tags to access=agricultural, foot=no, highway=track, vehicle=private. I've added the gates at each end as well taging them as access=private, barrier=gate, foot=no, vehicle=private. With this tagging OSM would consider there to be no public access whatever.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, A different problem, footpath Way: 1304673213, you've mapped as crossing 2 waterways, the waterways are restrictions to the highway. Are there bridges or fords crossing the waterways?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed several duplicated sections of highway which would have disrupted routing.

If a service road is also a public footpath please do not map the path on top of the road. Rather amend the tagging to the road to show it's dual use, designation=public_footpath
foot=designated
highway=service.

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your contribution to OSM is much appreciated, but, it contains many problems. There are 16 highway warnings given above which should be corrected.

If you could restrict the number of edits in any uploaded changeset to about 10 then it would be much easier for you or any other mapper to see any problems. Correcting these problems would then be easier for everyone.

I've removed a couple of duplicated highways. Also properly joined several other disconnected or crossing paths. I've unjoine several highways from area outlines as per OSM practice. I've amended many vehicle tags.

You tagged the path way:1253004962 as no public access, but this path is part of the route relation King Charles III England Coast Path: Cleveleys to Liverpool. I've removed the access restrictions and tagged it foot=yes. If this path is not now accessible then the route relation should be amended.

Regards Bernard.

Hello Smifff, Just to let you know I've removed all restriction tags so the road should soon be routable in OSM. I've also tagged the priority over the narrow bridge.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If the road is open then the access=no tag should also be removed from all sections. It looks open to me but I'm not local so I can't verify that.

Regards Bernard.

Fiction reverted.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM is a live worldwide database, fiction is not welcome here. Please stop adding fiction and revert the fiction you've already added.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You made several duplicate highways which would disrupt routing.

I've removed the duplicates.

If you limit your changeset to 10 to 20 features instead of nearly 500 you might see the problems you make.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution.

I've unjoined the path line from the landuse (field) outline, as per OSM practice. One question is the footpath formally named or signed and verifiable as per:- osm.wiki/Verifiability ? Or is 'Numbers Farm permissive path' a description. If it is then the name= tag should be changed to osm.wiki/Tag:description=.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, My apologies, it was 9 months ago, I don't know if that Esri image was then available. But you are correct.

I've now added back the construction area as best I can and amended the other areas and service roads. Do you know what the type of construction is?

The addition is made in Changeset: 154424186. Please feel free to revert this changeset if you wish to map the area yourself.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Bagis,

It was 9 months ago I changed a section of Jonstorpsvägen from highway=construction to highway=residential.

I also removed the construction area tagged construction=grass
landuse=construction from within an area tagged landuse=grass.

I can see no ongoing construction work in this area on any imagery. Could you please point out exactly where you see construction work on Esri,

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've tweaked a few things as mentioned above.

Hi, Please be aware of the many warnings given above. I've just remove some duplicated highway that you mapped.

Hi, Another problem. In a few places here you've mapped a footpath on top of a footpath. I've just now removed four such cases of highway duplication. Please be careful as this duplication disrupts routing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've got two number 14 Barleyfields, could you please check the house numbering?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed a few unnecessary park nodes from the park area.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, This platform is already mapped and is in a route relation, this is in the existing platform which you here partially duplicate. Please amend/correct existing mapping rather than drawing over it. Thus I've removed the duplicate.

Regards Bernard.

Removed, as platform 1 alreaddy mapped as relation on other platform line.

No response so I've reinstated this parking node, moved the shop to Hitchen as per website address