Hi, I've reverted this changeset in order to reinstate the platform that was dragged out of it's original shape.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've reverted this changeset in order to reinstate the platform that was dragged out of it's original shape.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed your new bridge Way: 1301823513 as this duplicated a section of existing highway, (possibly disrupting routing). I sectioned up the existing highway and inserted the bridge as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The new path Way: 1301700520 is a duplication of the existing public footpath Way: 175044188, thus I've removed it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your desire to better OSM is much appreciated. However unbeknownst to your good self this sidewalk is already mapped, the sidewalk tag is on the adjacent highway sections. This is a manner to map sidewalks you wouldn't know until you gain more experience.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Reviewing your mapping as requested I can see a few inadvertent mistakes.

The garages are crossing over each other, (warning given above). I think there would only be two garages, one for each house.

The two houses north of the garages look to be semi-detached, so they should be joined at the party wall.

The three other buildings tagged as building=house actually look like three pairs of semi-detached houses. So they are not a single residence, mapped thus the tag should be building=residential. If the building is split forming the two residences then each should be tagged building=house and house=semi-detached could also be added if desired.

If you need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Please be aware of the highway warnings above, the problems can disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.

Please be aware of the highway warnings above, the problems can disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately your mapping dragged a large area of many features out of alignment. Thus I've reverted the changeset. All is now OK.

The ways that you deleted from the OSM database are mostly genuine features that can be seen on the ground via aerial imagery. A lot are also shown as highways on Ordnance Survey maps. Some are actually public highways.

Please don't remove genuine verifiable features from the OSM database.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I think these paths ways are actually paths and should be tagged as such as per OSM guidelines. If they are not open to the public then the correct thing to do is add the tag access=private which indicates that there is no public access whatever, no other restriction tags are necessary.

The ways should not have a description in the name tag, these tags should be changed to description=? Lastly I wonder if you meant the description to indicate bird ringing, rather than bird riging.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The feature you named is not a wall nor is it named The Wall, it is the outline of a private parkland. The sections of the outline that are walls are separately tagged as such. I've removed your tag 'The Wall'.

Regards Bernard.

Fiction removed.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Way: 1300894018 was drawn with some self-intersections making duplicated sections of the highway. This would cause routing problems. I've made corrections but could you please be aware of this?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've corrected several highway problems including unjoing highways that were connected to the (layer=-1) bank.

I've corrected several more highway problems as shown in the warnings above.

More duplicated highways.

Hi, I've joined several highways that you mapped as crossing each other without joining.

Now make that 2 duplicated section of highway removed.

Hi, Please note and if possible correct the warnings given above. I've removed 1 duplicated section of highway that disrupted routing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your mapping was not quite what is expected for the OSM database, but is was a try. I've got all the original tagging back so no harm done. I've mapped the business, as per your tags, as a node by Coya on Throgmorton Street. This is where I approximated the position to be.

Hope this is OK, Regards Bernard.