Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM is a live worldwide database from which thousands of maps are compiled. OSM welcomes anyone to add ground truth verifiable data. Thus personal notes are not allowed and are regarded as fiction. So I've reverted your changes.

I hope you understand the concern. Regards Bernard.

Hi, A much better mapping of the roundabout layout. Unfortunately, you inadvertently broke two route relations when making the new highway section Way: Akeman Road (1297481216). I've joined the two sections of the highway thus restoring the route relations.

You should have got a warning about the route problems before saving the changes. I don't expect you could have realized the consequences but please try to always remedy warnings.

Regards Bernard.

Just to add to the above good comment. By deleting and remapping you are removing the mapping history of the feature. Looking at the history of the buildings now there is only yourself as the mapping user. Mapper Vormond's mapping in 2021 has been removed from the history, I've found it by temporarily reverting your deletion.

So to maintain as much history as possible it's better to amend/correct the original or existing feature.

Regards Bernard.

Sorry three bridges.

Hi, Are the two bridges actually boardwalks? If so then the tag should be bridge=boardwalk.

Regards Bernard.

Duplicated highways removed.

Hi, Again I've removed several duplicated highways.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your new tracks were placed on top of an existing track. This made duplication of highways which would disrupt routing. Thus I've removed all the duplications.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, A couple of points. The linear highway should not be connected to the area outline of the car park. I extended the Scorcher route to the center of the car park by a track section. Secondly going by the direction of all the cycleways it is impossible to route on the oneway Scorcher cycleway, you cannot get to the start of the Scorcher. It looks like the oneway direction is incorrect, or is the Scorcher two-way?

Regards Bernard.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your new highway Aagunta Road is placed on top of an existing highway making duplication. This will disrupt routing. Thus I've reverted the changeset. If a way needs amending/correcting it is OSM best practice to do the correction to the existing way. This allows for all history of the way to be maintained.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, a live worldwide database from which thousands of maps are compiled. As such fiction or test data can only do harm, if only at a very minor level. Thus I've reverted this changeset. Please feel free to add genuine data.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, There are lots of duplicated sections of highways across the airport. Please see here:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=72.62122&lat=23.07271&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

Could you please remove the duplications?

Hi, There are lots of duplicated sections of highways across the airport. Please see here:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=72.62122&lat=23.07271&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

Could you please remove the duplications?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately you've made lots of duplicated highways, some of then not even tagged. I think I've corrected all the problems at the south.

Regards Bernard.

Please consider my previous comment on the bus platform as mapping this way causes a duplicated highway edge as seen here:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-3.31107&lat=57.65009&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

The correct way is an unjoined platform area with a service road running through it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You joined your new footpath to a boundary outline, I've amended it to join the back service road. If you are local could you please check if this is now correct?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Unfortunately the tag amenity/landuse=sports_field is not in use by OSM, the nearest tag descriptor is landuse=recreation_ground. The area could be tagged access=private to indicate no public use.

I don't mind what you tag it as as long as it is logical. You changed the tag to amenity=school. Tagging it as amenity=school within an area already tagged amenity=school is wrong, that's why I amended it.

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've reverted the change.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The recreation ground is within the area outline of the school, so it was correctly mapped. So I've retagged the recreation ground as such. Thus the rec is part of the school.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the tags of your business to suit OSM best practice.

Regards Bernard.