BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 152540834 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Those blocks seem to be very strangely placed, not in the way usually placed to stop vehicles. Also not placed as per the image you tagged. That image is 7 years old. Are you sure those blocks are still there? I've removed the duplicate highway, track on top of the road. Regards Bernard. |
| 152538785 | over 1 year ago | Hi, the platform as an area feature does not extend to or join to the center line of Alexandra Road. Mapping thus makes for a duplicated section of highway at the join of platform and road. I've unjoined it again. A service road can be mapped through the platform area joining to Alexandra Road at both ends. But as this is a bus stop area with no parking it should only be for bus access. Regards Bernard. |
| 152538495 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The kissing gate would not be in the middle of Dunstable Road, it would be difficult for vehicles to get through. I've moved it just off the main road to control access to the footpath only. Please check that this is OK. Regards Bernard. |
| 152527181 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. There is access, (by your tags), to Way: 1193560233 so I've removed the access=no tag. The railway platform being a linear feature is regarded as a footway, so there's no need for a separate footway. In any case you joined one end of your footway,Way: 1291220029, to a fence so it would not have been routable. I've removed the footway. If the platform had been mapped as an area then it would have been OK to map a footpath desire line across it. I hope this helps. Regards Bernard. |
| 152385498 | over 1 year ago | Hi, You duplicated sections of 12 highways, this would disrupt routing. Please try to avoid making duplications. I've removed all the duplicated sections. Regards Bernard. |
| 152372219 | over 1 year ago | Hi, I've reverted the change to this road as you somehow duplicated most of it. Regards Bernard. |
| 152383807 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. OSM best practice is that school grounds are tagged amenity=school, they aren't the building, tag building+school is removed. Also formal names should be capitalised, I've tweaked the names. Regards Bernard. |
| 152377797 | over 1 year ago | Does the grass really extend and join to the center of asphalted highways? |
| 152343160 | over 1 year ago | Fiction removed. |
| 152371358 | over 1 year ago | Fiction removed. |
| 152379061 | over 1 year ago | Your silly fiction is removed. |
| 152364758 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The definitive map, (https://www.suffolk.gov.uk/asset-library/imported/Crowfield.pdf), shows that the footpath you've removed is a public right of way. The definitive map and statement are legal documents and do not show that this path has been extinguished. It can only be removed by a Definitive Map Modification Order, DMMO after the due process of application. Are you sure it's been extinguished? Or has the land owner merely decided not to recognize its existence? Regards Bernard. |
| 152298771 | over 1 year ago | Hi, This changeset dragged lots of highways out of alignment. I think I've corrected all of the problems. Please try not to do this as it seriously disrupts routing. Making smaller changesets (10/20 changes, there are 60 here), would allow you or others to more easily put right mistakes. Regards Bernard. |
| 152300728 | over 1 year ago | Hi, I've added passageways through the buildings, is this OK? Regards Bernard. |
| 152286252 | over 1 year ago | Hi, That's a strange name for a hospital, could you point to a website for the facility please? Regards Bernard. |
| 152286252 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Caroline Place is not a one-way street, it is a no-through road. If it were oneway vehicles would enter but not be able to get out. The changeset/152286411 is still open so I cannot leave a comment there for you. Please remove all the oneway tags. Regards Bernard. |
| 151832110 | over 1 year ago | Hi MacLondon, I just noticed that there is a duplicated section of cycleway. Namely Way: Hoe Street (1277857277) on top of Way: Hoe Street (662493479). Each is a member of a different route relation. There are more similar duplications on these cycleways to the south on Hoe Street, please see:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-0.01572&lat=51.57772&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas I'm not local so I thought you might be the person to look at this problem. Regards Bernard. |
| 152164756 | over 1 year ago | Hi, It's easy to square the buildings up. Select the building, right click, click the square icon, (shortcut Q). Your mapping will better reflect ground truth. Regards Bernard. |
| 152220296 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. From the wiki "natural=beach" should only be used for inclined, wave formed areas at the coast. Thus for OSM this is not a beach. Would the tag leisure=swimming_area be OK? With a description tag =(whatever the area is used for)? Regards Bernard. |
| 152086836 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. There are17 warnings given above about disconnected highways. I've joined several paths that you mapped as crossing over each other without joining. I think all is well now. Regards Bernard. |