BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 122740817 | over 3 years ago | Hi, East 2nd Street has been dragged out of alignment and it doesn't look correct to the eastern end. Looks like maybe some duplication there? |
| 123788983 | over 3 years ago | No response so I've amended the tags. |
| 123443817 | over 3 years ago | No response so removed poi |
| 123868806 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I thought something was a bit odd here as this site position is not listed on the ROS wiki. After a lot of searching, I found confirmation as to the correct ROC posts on Lincolnshire's monuments site. This site is actually Royal Observer Corps Post, Moulton Chapel:- https://heritage-explorer.lincolnshire.gov.uk/Monument/MLI125198 Royal Observer Corps Post, Holbeach is sited to the north near Holbeach:- https://heritage-explorer.lincolnshire.gov.uk/Monument/MLI81129 I've made suitable amendments, Regards Bernard. |
| 123766548 | over 3 years ago | Hi, I've removed several highways that you somehow duplicated while adding names. I think I've kept the new names. Regards Bernard. |
| 123788983 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The bunkers should be surface=sand, (as per OSM practice), rather than natural=sand as they are not natural features. Please see here:- leisure=golf_course#Features_within_a_golf_course Regards Bernard |
| 123782772 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've squared up the buildings and removed the name tags. The name "caravan" would not be the formal name for these multiple buildings. Also corrected the address tagging to the one building. Please read up on OSM best practices. Regards Bernard. |
| 123613668 | over 3 years ago | Hi, It's a car park, I can see it's a car park, a car park symbol is a "p". The car park is tagged as private thus I, as a possible customer, would not use it. Further, the service road to it is tagged private, so I would not even attempt to go to the car park. In most cases, folk don't use a map to find car parks so IMHO a sign at the area would be a better deterrent. Regards Bernard. |
| 123693651 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've reduced the Scout Hall outline to the building. The grounds area can be drawn separately. I also removed the name "Play area" from the playground, the description play area is implied from the playground tag. Regards Bernard. |
| 123587095 | over 3 years ago | Hi, You created a lot of duplicated highways by placing one roar on top of an existing road. I think I've corrected all the problems. |
| 123619023 | over 3 years ago | Hi, I've tagged it as disused:landuse=quarry, Regards Bernard. |
| 123618681 | over 3 years ago | Hi. welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've tweaked a few of the paths and removed your duplicated section of the path Way: 1078562581 Regards Bernard. |
| 123618110 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've tweaked the tags to the two care homes. Regards Bernard. |
| 123613668 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. If it's a private or customer car park then it should be tagged as such rather than deleted. I've tagged it access=private. Regards Bernard. |
| 123443817 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. There's already a POI for Camden Town here:- node/399607277#map=19/51.54215/-0.13907&layers=N which is part of the Relation: London Borough of Camden (51827). It may well be a better idea to add your tourism tag to the Camden Town POI node mentioned above. Need help please just ask. As for the guest house, you've placed the POI node in the road, there's no house here. I don't think there's an 18 Widley Road anyway, is this in one of the blocks of apartments? Anyway, it needs amending/moving at least. Regards Bernard. |
| 123422957 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. No need to delete a service road because the land is private. In fact, almost all land in the UK is private. With this logic, there would be nothing on UK maps. This road can be seen on many maps anyway, would you seeking its removal from Ordnance Survey maps as well I've reinstated the service road. If you feel a need you could tag it access=private though there may then be problems with delivery to the houses. Regards Bernard. |
| 123348841 | over 3 years ago | Hi, It flagged up as a edge section of duplicated highway. In that you had inadvertently drawn part of the area on top of the short residential section of Canterbury Road, east end of your area. I've made a minor amendment to correct it. Regards Bernard. |
| 123321509 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Highway Way: Trincomalee Hwy (1076594841) duplicates an existing highway so I've removed it. Please make any necessary corrections to the existing way. Regards Bernadr. |
| 123319529 | over 3 years ago | Hi, You've duplicated a highway here, Way: 1076584269 on top of Way: Leamington Road (1076584267). I've removed the duplication and amended the tags on the existing highway. Can you check that it's now correct, please? Regards Bernard. |
| 123264724 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Woods, parks, and marshlands should be drawn as areas rather than POIs Regards Bernard. |