Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've made a few minor tweaks to the outlines. The only big problem was the community_centre being joined to the underground railway. An easy mistake to make, I've unjoined them.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Being a residential area this feature looks more like a prank than a bank, thus I've removed it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You made a few duplications of highways here. Don't worry I think I've corrected everything.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I'm very sorry, I made a mistake but there's actually no need to worry. There were 4 nodes and 1 way involved, all in a very small area. It would be very easy to make out the edits done in the changeset, in fact, I've just checked it in a few seconds. So it is extremely easy for anyone in the community to navigate around these contributions. Indeed I have often navigated around large area changesets that folk have inadvertently made, and never really had a problem. Except that is when the changeset has many edits, (sometimes 100 or more), within it. I wonder if you are more concerned with the area rather than the content of the changeset.

Anyone concerned could easily check my work and see that I immediately reverted this changeset just in case I had uploaded changes on two continents.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Same question here.

Hi, Do you know if the recreation ground is for general public use or just for the school? Not your fault but being tagged as just a recreation ground does not indicate who is allowed to use it.

Thaks, Regards Bernard.

Hi, Several instances of highway duplication here, you placed roads on top of existing roads. I've made corrections but wanted to just let you know.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've got the Greenway tagged as a 1.5-mile-long bridge. You also have some sections of it duplicating existing highways. It also several times crosses over other highways with no joins.

From the current Bing and Maxar imagery on JOSM, it looks like some sections as set out do not exist, or are way out of alignment. Perhaps the Greenway should have included some of the existing cycleways?

Could you have a look to try and fix the bridge, duplicated sections, and unjoined crossing highways, please? Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've reinstated the original buildings and then amended them to suit your new mapping. Is something is incorrect it's OSM practice to amend the original or existing mapping, thus all history is kept intact.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've not quite got this right. There is already a node tagged proposed:barrier=bollard if this is in the correct place then the tag should be amended to barrier=bollard which be a restriction to the highway. It should also be tagged with the positive access allowed past the bollard foot=yes for example. Your new bollard being only a named node has no meaning in OSM, it's not a highway restriction.

For Raglan Street, if the status remains as a residential highway with no restriction to public access then it's not a permissive road and the two permissive tags should be removed.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the access=no tag as there is still some access and added vehicle=no, which means there is no vehicle access of any type.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've tweaked a few tags and areas to suit OSM practice.

Hi, I;ve tweaked a few tags and areas to suit OSM practice.

Hi There, Thanks for having a go.

What you've actually done is to move the crossing point slightly north which is OK as that is now better positioned. But, it's the bollard that is the problem, it needs to be joined onto a highway in order to be a restriction to that highway.

I beg your pardon as I write I see the bollard re-render now joined to the highway. All is OK now.

Happy mapping.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your bollard Node: 9822707952 needs to be joined to a highway in order for it to make restrictions to a highway. At the moment it is not joined so makes no restriction. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please be advised that Rockland St Mary FP 3 is now returned to its correct position as per the county definitive map at:- http://maps.norfolk.gov.uk/highways/

Regards Bernard.

Hi, This would not be tagged as amenity=place_of_worship, thus I've removed the tags amenity=place_of_worship and religion=no. Please refrain from adding fiction.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please map single sections of highways independently. Here you've tried to map several highways as one continuous line. This has resulted in several instances of duplicated highways. I'll try to correct the problems.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, This is actually a bridleway and I believe, (even though it isn't designated) that it is Suffolk CC policy to allow cycling on a bridleway.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, There seems to be something wrong with the new Webpage address you've added.