Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed footpath Way: 1062299807 from joining the power line as you mapped it and removed duplicated section of the same path.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, No response so I've removed apartment from highway.

Hi, I've reinstated the unclassified status to Burnt Hill Lane.

Regards Bernard.

Hello,

Please be aware that you are inadvertently making lots of duplications of short sections of highways. Please look here to see the many duplications represented by blue triangles:- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=68.40684&lat=26.02513&zoom=13

These duplicated sections should be removed as they disrupt routing. Please try to correct your previous and future mapping. Do you need any help?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Route relation and motorway are removed. Please don't add false data.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the road as it is a duplication of the existing highway.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please don't be so silly, I've removed the motorway link road.

Regards Bernard.

A question if I may? Is the building still closed because of Covid19 as per the opening hours tag here?

Thanks.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There's no need to duplicate data on both a building outline and a POI. I've amended the data to the outline where your amended name is. The name is rendered by most software.

Regards Bernard.

Sorry I didn't realise I'd downloaded the whole original changeset area. I reverted some deleted objects, and made several amendments in a couple of small areas.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please have regard to the warnings given to uploads. There are several warnings listed above.

Please don't delete and redraw objects that need correcting/amending. OSM practice is, when possible like here, to update/amend the existing object, Thus keeping all history of the object intact in the OSM database. No history is lost. I've reinstated the original objects.

Names in OSM should be the formal verifiable names. Descriptions like 'big house' and 'what is this' are not names and ought be removed. Tags like note=??? and description=??? are valid tags for this sort of thing.

A car park in school grounds is not a residential area nor would it be named 'car park'.

Lime Kiln Close wouldn't be a oneway road, otherwise, how would traffic get out? Also duplicated sections and drives tagged residential and name with lower case initial letters. Removed, and reinstated the original line.

I've made several amendments to suit OSM practice. There's a lot to learn in OSM mapping.

Best Regards Bernard.

Hi, OK thanks, it's now removed

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Can you give more info on the tourist apartment and a more precise position please? As it is a name only POI in the middle of a road isn't very helpful.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, That's done.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I see you've somehow ended up with three overlapping heath areas, Way: 1058640492, Way: 1058640493, and Way: 1058875735. Many of the heath area nodes are incorrectly joined to center lines of highways.

Your other heath area Way: 1058640491 is also joined onto highways and other features.

I've not amended anything so you can see the problems. I can make the amendments if you wish.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks for responding, I've reverted the changes. That area was tagged as scrub. Is it scrub or a garden area? The images are not very clear.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Is there really a second Memorial Hall here? If not could you please revert your change to the OSM database? Need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please be aware that placing a new highway atop an existing highway is duplication which can disrupt routing. You've probably added these duplications inadvertently. please be advised that amendments/corrections to a feature should be made to the existing feature so as to keep all associated history intact. This has happened in this changeset and I think some others. To make it easier I'll refer to all duplicates here.

I've removed Way: Tregunnick Lane (1058381437), Way: Tregunnick Lane (1058381416), Way: Tregunnick Lane (1058381434), Way: Tregunnick Lane (1058381417), Way: Tregunnick Lane (1058381433), Way: Tregunnick Lane (1058381415) and Way: Tregunnick Lane (1058381414). I've added your new tags onto the existing highways.

Regards Bernard.

Yes, I understood it as meaning the road had gates on it, not that Gated Road was a name.

Hi, I've removed the ford from on top of the bridge Way: 1056170361. Disconnected the river from the bridge. Removed the duplicated section of highway taken by the bridge.

Regards Bernard.