BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 121836443 | over 3 years ago | Hi, The tag to use is noexit=yes, barrier=yes might not be recognised as it does not describe the barrier. I've amended the tagging. |
| 121836227 | over 3 years ago | Hi, You have removed the barriers from the OSM database. You might now need to update the software/app that you use. |
| 121803652 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are you sure the power substation you deleted has been removed from within the building? If not it should be restored. You've got the tagging on the POI all wrong, please follow the introduction and good practice for mapping to OSM. The postcode on the POI does not seem to be for this location, are you sure you've located it correctly? I can see no address on your website nor anything to state if it's an office or open for customers to visit. OSm is not the place for online-only businesses. Regards Bernard. |
| 121763054 | over 3 years ago | I've amended the path and removed the unlikely name. |
| 121763242 | over 3 years ago | I've reverted your incorrect sport tag. |
| 121763622 | over 3 years ago | Wood within a wood (duplication), with a fictitious descriptive name, is removed. Please only upload features as per OSM good practice. Regards Bernard. |
| 121763973 | over 3 years ago | Hi, I've removed the name tag as that's not a formal name. joined the path to highways at each end. |
| 121764445 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap . I've reverted these changes because they incorrectly show features with self-intersections and leave another area incorrectly tagged and with a fiction name. Regards Bernard. |
| 121762243 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Names should be formal and verifiable, thus I've removed the descriptive name tags. Also made a few tweaks. Regards Bernard. |
| 121679218 | over 3 years ago | Hi, A building must have at least 1 level to exist. The tag building:levels=? should indicate the number of floors of the building above ground, (excluding any roof). Could you please amend your tag "building:levels=0" to show the above-ground number of floors. Regards Bernard. |
| 121627072 | over 3 years ago | Hello There,
I've already corrected dozens of these duplications by sectioning the highways and removing the duplicated parts. There are still dozens more to repair. Unfortunately, I now see that you are still overlapping highways (making still more duplicated sections). The warnings listed above imply several more problems with highways added in this changeset alone. Could you please take steps to avoid creating these problems? Could you please correct the occurrences of duplicated sections of highways? Regards Bernard. |
| 121539126 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenSterreMap.
I've reverted to reinstate the building you deleted then redrew the original building outlines. Regards Bernard. |
| 121483218 | over 3 years ago | Hi, You've added highway=footway to a previously untagged way over 12km long Way: 533372695. This way was originally mapped untagged in 2017. I don't what it is supposed to represent but from it's line it's clearly not a footpath. I've removed the footpath tag. I've removed the seamark:type=gate and
Way: 485006906 has access, it's access=private rather than no. Regards Bernard. |
| 53039720 | over 3 years ago | Hi Pete,
Regards Bernard. |
| 121470330 | over 3 years ago | I forgot to say 'tarmac' is not a valid surface tag value, I've changed all of them to 'asphalt'. |
| 121470330 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Review, rather difficult with so many edits in one changeset. Five to ten is more manageable, you or anyone else can then more easily find mistakes. I made a few amendments detailed below otherwise pretty good. Duplicated section of
Regards Bernard. |
| 121414707 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please don't cram so many changes/edits into one changeset, it makes checking by yourself or others very difficult. Five, or up to ten would be better. I've removed your bridleway Way: 445051077 because it duplicates the existing bridleway. Way: 1063214553 as above. Your footpath Way: 1063214552 was removed as its duplication. Way: 1063214557 as above.
I've also made quite a few tweaks to highways around here and added designation details. There's a lot to learn about OSM mapping and you've made a really good first effort. Regards Bernard. |
| 121110786 | over 3 years ago | Hi, No response so I've removed all of the duplicated sections of highway. |
| 121316102 | over 3 years ago | Hi, I've removed the residential area name from the area outline, it's already on the village POI.
|
| 121276498 | over 3 years ago | Hi, You've joined many path lines/nodes to the outline of Way: High Wood (139271846). This is not good practice because the lines have to then be separated to edit them. I've separated the features. |