BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 108986128 | over 4 years ago | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, your mapping has resulted in many paths being duplicated. Your new paths are placed mainly on top of existing paths and roads. Even the path along the beach is duplicated. Thus because the changes and duplicated ways amend other existing ways I think it's best to revert the whole changeset. I've reverted the changeset in my Changeset: 109131669. I realise the problems were caused inadvertently. Could you please explain what you were trying to do, maybe I can help. Regards Bernard |
| 109108927 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. No need for a multipolygon relation for a simple object (house). I've amended that and squared up all the buildings. Squaring up is easy in iD editor. Regards Bernard. |
| 109102898 | over 4 years ago | Hi, No harm done, glad to help if you need it. Regards Bernard. |
| 109102898 | over 4 years ago | Please stop uploading until you know what you're doing, you're likely to corrupt the database. Regards Bernard. |
| 109102820 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You somehow uploaded 13 nodes onto the exact same position, some tagged as traffic lights, some untagged. I've removed them all for you as I would think the uploads were inadvertent. Please be careful not to upload fiction or tests to OSM as OSM is a live worldwide database from which maps are constantly being compiled. Please refrain from uploading again till you know what you're doing. If you need help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 108631973 | over 4 years ago | Some were triplicated. |
| 108630085 | over 4 years ago | Hi, I removed many untagged nodes. Regards Bernard. |
| 108631973 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Some duplicated highway sections were removed. Regards Bernard. |
| 108889099 | over 4 years ago | I've amended a lot but there's still lots more that need fixing. |
| 108889099 | over 4 years ago | There are also ways that are not tagged at all, and a duplicated area outlines in a multipolygon. I've corrected these. |
| 108889099 | over 4 years ago | You've also left large gaps between the fields and joined lots of field edges to highway center lines. I've corrected quite a few of these problems. |
| 108889099 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Please be aware that you've uploaded several area outlines that are self-intersecting. Also, many similarly tagged areas overlap each other and adjoining areas. Although minor issues this is still not correct mapping, the fields do not overlap each other. Please also consider limiting the number of edits in a changeset, it makes tracking mistakes easier for you. Regards Bernard. |
| 108956129 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Almost all land in the UK is private, it seems that this car park, (according to your opinion), is only exceptional in that it's not openly available to the public. This opinion can be described by the tag access=private. Please be aware that anything that can be determined and verified by the public, (without going against any copyright) is acceptable for inclusion on the OSM database. I've reinstated the car park and tagged it access=private. Regards Bernard. |
| 108935089 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see you've amended an embankment into a 200m long gate. Most likely inadvertently, Shall I revert this change? I see you've mapped a gate on Malvern Road but that gate wouldn't be part of Malvern Road it's really a gate into a property Regards Bernard. |
| 108377939 | over 4 years ago | Hi, No problem, I didn't know whether you'd had a look or not.
|
| 108913839 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The tag oneway=no is not necessary and discouraged as in its absence it is implied. Regards Bernard. |
| 108915893 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Hasn't the bollard near to Stacy road been removed to allow vehicle access from the north into onto the section you've tagged as motor_vehicle=no? If assuming your amendment is correct then bicycle access to a cycleway would mean that access for that purpose is allowed, thus the tag access=no ought not to be added? Regards Bernard. |
| 108377939 | over 4 years ago | Fixed now. |
| 108377939 | over 4 years ago | OK no response so all fixed now. Regards Bernard. |
| 108101468 | over 4 years ago | OK amendments made and whole Millenium Way walk now mapped, relation/13019720. https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=13019720 |