Hi, There is usually no need for negative tags like intermittent=no or oneway=no as in their absence they are implied.

I've made minor amendments to the water areas.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, there seems to be a public footpath and a cycleway on roughly the same line here. Surely this isn't correct? The definitive map shows the public footpath separate and nearer to the sewage works. Then a separate way (probably the cycleway) joining onto Langford Drive.

Could you have a look at this please?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, these buildings and others around this area to which you've added the tag landuse=residential are actually within an existing larger area tagged landuse=residential. Thus duplication of landuse tagging.

Secondly, regarding this changeset you've got building within building, I think the inner buildings (garages) ought be tagged as a building:part=?

Regards Bernard.

I initially amended to correct self-intersections on those gardens. I corrected a few of the garden areas tagged as residential because they were totally enclosed by another residential area, making for residential enclosed by residential. You deleted Way: 793106372 landuse=residential, the polygon in Changeset #108187937 that enclosed all the houses and gardens.

If you look a bit further you'll see that it's this area of Cambridge that's the odd one out in mapping gardens as residential areas. The vast majority of the country if not the world encloses the totality of a residential area in a larger single polygon. In fact this is also the case for the larger part of Cambridge as well.

Regards Bernard.

Self-intersecting points removed.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder if the holes are actually formally named or are these just reference numbers? If merely reference numbers then the tag would be ref=1, ref-2 etc. If they really are formal names then the name should start with a capital letter and there should be a space between name and number. Formal hole names are usually to show/promote/memorialise a certain feature, person, or object. Thus the name seems not to be a formal verifiable name, hole 1 is just a reference.

Also there's no need for two tags denoting a grass area. A tee has a surface, in this case it's grass. Growing grass in this situation is not landuse, it's to provide a surface.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your path Millenium way is in part on top of Long Road, part beside and on top of an existing footpath. Then partly on top of a stream where you've mapped five fords.

Are you trying to map this walk:- http://www.hardwick-cambs.org.uk/footpaths-walks/ if so then it needs a lot of correcting. I think it might be best to remove this mapping and start again.

Need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, a node in a highway tagged with a name only doesn't convey any feature/object information. Is it a highway feature or something else? Could it refer to the land area just south of here tagged as Parr Bridge, which is referred to as Parr Brow on Ordnance Survey Maps (Node: Parr Bridge (30416816)? Anyway it ought not to be a node of the highway.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, If this is not the current formal and verifiable name then it ought not be used. If it's an historic name you could use the tag old_name=New Manchester as per this advice old_name=*

Regards Bernard.

Hi the school name in on the premises boundary outline as per OSM practice. I've removed the name from the building and amended the name on the outline.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, requested review.
The grass outline was self-intersecting as was the fence line. The residential area was dragged out of alignment and was thus self-intersecting. Same with the school outline.

The footpath had about multiple nodes on the same spot in two places, it was placed on top of the fence and other boundary lines.

It would have been very difficult to explain how to rectify these problems so I've made corrections. I also remove the formal name 'Public footpath@from a single node.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

I've amended the two POIs to OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Removed duplication.

This looks like fiction so I've removed it.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've tweaked your tags to OSM practice. Please don't use OSM tags or comments for advertising. Your business description is on your website.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The school name and data are on the premises outline as per OSM practice, so there's no need to add the name to each building.

Regards Bernard.

Path tags amended to OSM practice. Please note there is foot access to a footpath so access=no shouldn't be used.

Path tags amended to OSM practice.

Highway tags amended to OSM practice.

Path tags amended.