Hello,
As I said before the path would not be formally named "Footpath 45". Thus I've removed the fiction.

Further caution=concealed ditch is not a recognised key/value tag in OSM, Thus I've changed it to note=concealed ditch which is accepted but will not be rendered. Only an editor will see the note.

Regards Bernard.

Amended footpath tagging.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Footpath 45 would not really be a formal name.

A path with a parish number I assume would be a public footpath. So I've amended the tagging to reflect this.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Inspire Medics seem to be a credit and finance company office rather than an educational institution office. Features added to OSM must be verifiable, please see:- osm.wiki/Verifiability

I think this is an online-only facility, the tagging is misleading at best. OpenStreetMap is not a business directory. If your online facility does not have a physical presence then it may not be added to OSM. If it does have a physical presence - for example, if there is an office somewhere - then you can place an office=company POI where that office is.

If you add further tags then understand that these tags will describe that physical location, i.e. the office. Do not, for example, add a tag that implies 24/7 opening hours just because the web site is open 24/7 - only add such a tag if the office is open 24/7. Same with any tags that would describe what you are selling; do not add descriptions that advertise, the link to your wesite will surfice.

Under no circumstances must you add advertising copy ("World's finest XY", "Premier ABC supplier", "For all your XYZ needs"); this has no place in OSM and should be deleted.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please be more careful, you have tagged some long sections of highways as bridges.

Hi, I've removed Way: 962946913 (unclassified highway) that you placed on top of an existing footpath. There does not seem to be an unclassified highway on this line.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed a duplicated highway. Please don't place a highway on top of an existing highway it's duplication that messes with routing.

If a highway (or any feature) needs correcting/amending please correct/amend the existing feature thus the way history will be maintained. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the tagging of the features here to more meet OSM practice. the name= tag is for formal verifiable names, not descriptions.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed/amended dubious tags. It may well be a Palace of Tat but I can find no formal reference to that name. Names must be verifiable.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted 3 changesets to remove fiction and to repair changes to boundaries. If you need help mapping genuine features please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted 3 changesets to remove fiction and to repair changes to boundaries. If you need help mapping genuine features please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Just to let you know you inadvertently dragged highway nodes out of place. No problem I've reverted them without affecting your change to the relation.

Regards Bernard.

Hi GinaroZ, Just to let you know that you could have just reverted the lake outline. Then the history of the other ways affected by this revert would have been maintained, it's OSM practice to retain history if possible.

Your revert left behind several now untagged nodes which I've removed. It also removed the layer tag from the platform making the platform the same layer as the lake, I've added a layer=1 tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hello Helen,
Better late than never, Thanks for your positive response to the problems. Yes, you can comment and re comment here on these changesets. You can also click on a mapper's name where among other things there's a send message option for maybe topics not specifically related to the changeset. (Click on your own name to see your history of editing.) There's also lots of help and forums found easily through Google. Please feel free to ask for help if it's needed.

Regards Bernard.

Squared up buildings, tweaked hedges off of highways, tagged track instead of unclassified highway.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

No need to put school name on the building as per OSM practice it's on the premises outline. Duplicated name removed.
Squared-up buildings as well.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Huge changesets make it very difficult to track down mistakes, over 200 objects are added or modified in this changeset. A problem has occurred with landuse area Way: 37632118 which you modified and inadvertently dragged a track out of alignment. I've fixed the track.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Footpaths Way: 960996946 and Way: 960996948 are highlighted as having self-intersection points, I've corrected several self-intersections and removed several duplicated sections.

It's better and easier, (less likely to inadvertently make mistakes), to map paths with each section as a separate object, not as one long line doubling back on itself.

Again these mistakes are very hard to find/isolate in a large changeset like this.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The school playing field is within the mapped greater school area so no need to tag again as a school, I've reverted tags. I made quite a few more amendments to buildings and areas.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Huge changeset so it's difficult to see the problems, better to upload fewer features at a time perhaps ten. Quite a few problems with highway joining onto areas. The highway you draw represents the center line of the highway. It is very unusual for areas to join onto the centerlines of highways. I've corrected a few but there are likely many more.