Hi, I just realised you might have meant the barrier to be at the level crossing. It was actually at the road junction.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've removed the two track names you added as they seem not to be formal names but rather descriptions. The access=private tag indicates that all access is private.
I also removed the tag barrier=Private_electric_gate that you placed on the public highway. That indicated that no traffic could pass along the unclassified road. It looks like there could be a barrier a few yards into the track. If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

OK no response so I've reinstated it.

Hi, you made lots of duplicated highways and areas here. I think I've corrected them all and made some self-intersecting areas into multipolygons.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, as said above some of your edits are incorrect and could be viewed as vandalism. I've looked at the ways you added and have removed several duplicated highways.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I'm afraid the description tag, nor the name on its own will be much help in aiding delivery's. Much better to to draw the house and tag it with a full address.

I've drawn in some building, perhaps you could tag the houses building=house and add the address. Need help just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder if the path is really a cutting as regards OSM? Please see cutting=*

Regards Bernard.

Hi, your steps and paths at Waitrose don't seem to make logical sense, there are differing levels tagged and I presume differing layers but their all joined together.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

By deleting all the buildings and re-drawing them you have removed all the history of the mapping of the buildings going back several years. It is OSM practice to where needed amend/correct the existing mapping, thereby keeping all the history and adding your new history to the database. I notice you used Bing imagery as a base to map the buildings, please be aware that any imagery may be offset from reality.

The Only way to reinstate the history of these buildings is to revert the changeset, then amend/correct the reinstated (original) buildings. If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Thanks now OK.

Sorted.

Hi, I've amended the track, path and old railway tagging, (removed duplicate rail line).

Regards Bernard.

Amended track names and status.

Hi, I've removed the duplicated sections of highway, access=no and path tags. Added track agricultural to the ways as this is what they appear to be. Tweaked the track and area lines to reflect Bing images. It may be that there is also some access to fishing areas.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I reinstated this track, tagged it as agricultural, added a gate barrier.
Please amend existing not delete and add incorrect features.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the duplicated section of highway then tagged the ways as service roads for allotments.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks for trying to correct the error by adding back a path. Unfortunately this wasn't quite correct. (Please if amendments are needed amend the original mapped features if possible, this keeps the way history.)

I've removed your access=no path and reverted back to the features that were deleted. I tagged the track access=agricultural and added a gate access=agricultural. fences added back as well. It now looks pretty much like the Bing imagery. If tweaks are needed please do so.

Regards Bernard

No response so tag reinstated.

Hi if the path is a right of way then there is access and by foot is public not permissive. I've amended a few tags.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing.
I've removed access=no from the path as this indicate there is no public access. If it's a public footpath then clearly there is access to it. I've added designation=public_footpath and changed surface=trail to surface=ground.

Regards Bernard.