Hi, I've aligned the golf course outline to better merge with adjacent areas and un-joined power line from golf course features.

Hi, Please see here:- golf=cartpath to understand that a cartpath is a linear feature and should not be drawn as an area. Zoom in to the ones you've added and you will see the grass rendered in the center of each of your paths.

Also as I said before, please see here for a guide on golf course features tagging:- leisure=golf_course

If you need help pleas just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've adjusted the building outline to the actual building rather than the whole premises.
Added the website.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You seem to have drawn the outline of probably a garden and tagged it as a house. Could you please have a look to remedy this.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Features added to the OSM database must be verifiable to everyone and not include personal or fictional data. I've amended your tagging to what I think you probably meant and in a manner acceptable to OSM. I've drawn in the five houses perhaps you could put the address on the correct house, (or tell me and I'll do it).

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You somehow dragged a hedge and field outline into the sea. No problem though I've returned them.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just wanted to let you know that someone deleted your new POI because it duplicated an already existing POI.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've modified your tagging of the footpath to suit established OSM practice. Footpath 91 is a public right of way reference not a formal name.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There is already a speed camera tagged as a node (Node: 3460438800) close to your new one. Neither are tagged as per OSM practice, please see:- highway=speed_camera
I'm not local so can't specifically advice how to tag but could you possibly look to rectify the problem.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've tagged this junction as a turning loop. please see:- highway=turning_loop It does not seem to meet the criteria for a turning loop. I can't see any imagery that shows there is a roundabout either.
I've therefore removed the tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A few observations of your new mapping.

It's usual for a highway=path to be mapped as a lineal rather than an area feature, with a width if desired. An area highway should be tagged as area:highway=path, but in these circumstances this would be unusual. Better that paths highways are linear features.

Please see here for a guide on golf course features tagging:- leisure=golf_course
The greens and fairways are features of the course and as such are classed as an amenity rather than a landuse so the surface=grass tag is used to describe grass areas. Landuse=grass is usually an area used to grow a crop of grass, natural=grass is an area that usually grass is allowed to grow naturally, a meadow. Grass on a golf course is managed usually to facilitate the sport.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If there is foot access to a path then the tag access=no is incorrect. You've tagged two paths as foot=yes, thus I've removed the two access=no tags.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
A couple of points about this contribution to OSM.
The two buildings would look neater if squared up, (select the two buildings, (shift+ctrl+left mouse button on each building), right mouse button, click the square symbol (shortcut Q)).

The footpath Way: 848151951, tagged as layer=-1 indicates that it is underneath the building layer, (underground). I don't think this is actually the case. If it is a passageway it should be tagged the same as the passageway on Convair Walk with highway=footway
tunnel=building_passage, no layer tag. Please see here for full explanation:- https://tinyurl.com/y3hz6eht

If you need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, regarding the bridge it's what is called round here an earth bridge. Pipes or a bridging structure are built in the ditch then the track is made up to level with earth. there are several over the marsh, (not all are mapped). I've been wandering around there for over 60 years.
Regards Bernard.

Hi,
I removed self intersection of ways, tweaked path lines and added a bridge, plus a few more tweaks. Thus to overcome anomalies in this changeset.

Regards Bernard

Hi,
I notice that all your changeset comments are identical, they lack any meaningful content. As such the comments are of no meaningful use to other contributors or the OSM project. Please see here:- osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
for an explanation of good changeset comments. Follow the advice and you'll increase the value of your edit for yourself and your fellow mappers.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I squared up the buildings to make them neater, tweaked/corrected a few. More than one house in a building then it can be tagged building=residential, either that or terrace the building.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I don't think this change worked out as you intended, it dragged a fence and woods line out of alignment. I've reverted the change so there's no harm done. Need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, For some reason the carpark was mapped as a multipolygon being two joined sections of way. Thus the tags were correctly on the multipolygon, I had placed the tags from the POI onto the multipolygon.
There is no actual need for the carpark to be mapped as a multipolygon so I've deleted it. Then joined the two sections into a regular polygon and transferred all tags onto it. I think it's now as require.

Regards Bernard

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Sorry to say that your changes dragged highways and kerbs greatly out of shape, also made the planter half a mile long.
In order to be certain of getting features back to their original position I've reverted your changes.
If you need help with something please just ask.

Regards Bernard.