Hi, Also a section looks like duplication very close to Stawell Road. There were some untagged nodes dotted about, I think I've removed all of them.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, It looks like you've got several sections of Escaile Road duplicated.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
I want to let you know that you've inadvertently joined Way: 853752169 (level=1) to Way: 853752170 (level=0) at several nodes, also Way: 853751380 (level=1) is joined to Way: 853752170 (level=0).
Regards Bernard.

Hi,
You've placed a highway (footpath) atop an existing highway (service). Thus duplicating a highway at the single position.
I've removed the duplicate (path) and amended the tags on the existing highway to positively allow foot use.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
You've placed a highway (footpath) atop an existing highway (service). Thus duplicating a highway at the single position.
I've removed the duplicate (path) and amended the tags on the existing highway to positively allow foot use.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
You've placed a highway (footpath) atop an existing highway (service). Thus duplicating a highway at the single position.
I've removed the duplicate (path) and amended the tags on the existing highway to positively allow foot use.

Regards Bernard.

Thanks Clive.

Hi Welcome top OpenStreetMap.

Are you sure it's a oneway section or have the bus routes changed? The reason I ask is that three of the bus routes using this highway section indicate operating two way through here.

Regards Bernard

Hi, You are welcome to add genuine features to OSM but please don't add website addresses which are not relevant to the object.
I've removed the two websites.
Regards Bernard.

I also removed woods from extending across the trunk road A47, a very dangerous hazard for vehicles.

Hi, I've removed the self intersection of Way: 852160460
Regards Bernard

Hi,

In drawing the massive farmland area Way: 851901419 (which actually is not all farmland so is incorrect), you inadvertently self intersected and dragged a section of Way: Swaffham Road (539686138) out of alignment. Thus disrupting correct routing of the highway A1122. No problem now though, I spotted the mistake and have corrected it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, very pleased to hear from you thanks.

I don't think it's possible to revert with the iD editor so I've fully reverted both changesets with JOSM editor (which is fairly easy). Everything is back as it was before your edits so you can carry on.

The note about copyright infringement is here:- osm.org/copyright

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I just wanted to let you know that it is not OK to use Ordnance Survey data to map in OSM. Ordnance Survey data is copyright material. You would be advised to revert these two changesets and start again. Mapping from your on the ground survey and on-site signage.

Regards Bernard

Looks OK.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, There seems to be an anomaly here:-osm.org/#map=19/51.49758/-0.17337&layers=N
You have, from Exhibition Road, Way: 851362858 (no layer tag so it's implied as layer=0) joining to Way: 851362859 (tunnel tagged as layer=-1) which joins to Way: 851362857 (bridge tagged layer=1). The bridge (layer=1) is connected in the middle to the private service road layer=0. Half of the bridge layer=1 also has Way: 851362860 layer=0 joined to it. Way: 851362860 is also joined to the private road and the tunnel.

I can't see from the imagery how the layout should be, perhaps you could please look at this.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Way: 851250894 is untagged.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, You could split the way so the tag "temporary:access=no" can be put on the closed sections also tag with note**=* giving a brief reason for placing the no access tag. Please remember to go back and remove the temp tags later on.

If you need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It seems there is an anomaly here, you've got Matcham Court and Candish Court drawn on top of the Quadrangle building.

Could you have a look and remedy please? If you need help please just ask in this comment section.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've removed the Primark POI as it duplicates the data on the mapped building outline.
By the way, I think you got the number wrong.

Regards Bernard.