OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
90422951 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry to say that you've somehow added a lot of self intersections with your mapping. Please see here :- https://tinyurl.com/y3r9w7zg Could you please rectify these errors. If you need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

90467237 over 5 years ago

Hi the landuse=residential area is already mapped as a multipolygon. I've amended to remove the duplicate area implication.
Regards Bernard.

90467177 over 5 years ago

The residential area is within a larger residential multipolygon area. Thus this area is duplication, I've removed the duplication, added a POI for this place and updated the multipolygon area tags.

Regards Bernard.

90453352 over 5 years ago

Hi, to whom is the access permitted?

90452646 over 5 years ago

Hi, you only map a crossing if it is a formal feature of the highway. There are lots of paths crossing roads with no formal crossing point.

90452618 over 5 years ago

I joined some of the paths to roads. Added rail crossing.

90452416 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I unjoined waterway from the bridge and boundary, reversed water direction, join waterways. Then tweaked some footways. all to suit OSM practice.

90350374 over 5 years ago

Hi, Just to let you know that usually there is no need for the tag oneway=no as this is implied by OSM by it's absence.

Regards Bernard.

90347259 over 5 years ago

Hi, in the absence of the tag oneway=no OSM usually takes it as implied that there is not a oneway restriction. Thus in this cast the tag oneway=no is unnecessary.

Regards Bernard.

90330269 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The OSM tag internet_access is not meant for public access sites not those places limited to student access, please see :- internet_access=*

Thus I've removed those tags and added a note to describe WLAN access. I removed the boundary as it's not relevant. I placed the POI data on the building outline.

Regards Bernard.

90250751 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It's OSM practice when a feature needs amending/correcting to do this to the existing feature if possible. Thus all history of the feature is maintained.

Your new paths were placed on-top of existing highways. I've remove the duplicated sections of way, keeping the updated tags.

Regards Bernard.

90181817 over 5 years ago

Tweak path and field lines, add bridge, join stiles to path line.

90183131 over 5 years ago

A few tweaks to buildings and paths.

90260833 over 5 years ago

Generator reinstated to relation that was inadvertently removed.

90266909 over 5 years ago

Hi, Please see here for golf features tagging :- leisure=golf_course

Regards Bernard.

90208439 over 5 years ago

Hi,
Do you need the two building joined into one building with the same overall outline? I can do it for you if you wish.
Regards Bernard.

89100303 over 5 years ago

Hi, I likely didn't see, change all that needed changing.

The references are the LIL 4/2 which are County Council references. They usually mean Parish, path number, path section number, (or something like that). If a path has a formal name by all means tag it as well as the ref number.

If I can help further please just ask. Regards Bernard.

90140083 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I think you must be mistaken at least on some of your tags. Access=no, there must be some access here as motor vehicles can clearly be seen on Bing imagery. Your tags bicycle, foot, horse, motor_vehicle=no means no access by these means either public or private. Could you please state the source of this information? Also can this be verified as per :- osm.wiki/Verifiability ?

Regards Bernard.

89749751 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Sorry to say this changeset has made many duplications of highways, (highways mapped on top of existing highways). Please see here :- https://tinyurl.com/y6mtyvz5
If you need to amend or correct a way please correct the existing way not draw another way atop the existing.

Because the duplication is extensive and there are route relations involved it might be best to revert this changeset entirely. You can then start afresh with any corrections.

Need help please just ask. Regards Bernard.

90039567 over 5 years ago

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your data and updating are valuable but some of it is inadvertently duplicating existing data/features. I've removed some duplicate POI and data, updated data on area outlines as per OSM practice. I placed the camp site entrance on the highway.

Your three Bird Sactuary POI's don't really make sense from an OSM data view. The walkway is not on a walking way nor looks like a viewpoint, (just the side of a road). The Bird Sanctuary Parking free node is not tagged as parking nor does it look like a viewpoint. I can't figure out what you might mean here so I can't help with amendments on these features.

Regards Bernard.