Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If there is foot access to a path then the tag access=no is incorrect. You've tagged two paths as foot=yes, thus I've removed the two access=no tags.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
A couple of points about this contribution to OSM.
The two buildings would look neater if squared up, (select the two buildings, (shift+ctrl+left mouse button on each building), right mouse button, click the square symbol (shortcut Q)).

The footpath Way: 848151951, tagged as layer=-1 indicates that it is underneath the building layer, (underground). I don't think this is actually the case. If it is a passageway it should be tagged the same as the passageway on Convair Walk with highway=footway
tunnel=building_passage, no layer tag. Please see here for full explanation:- https://tinyurl.com/y3hz6eht

If you need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, regarding the bridge it's what is called round here an earth bridge. Pipes or a bridging structure are built in the ditch then the track is made up to level with earth. there are several over the marsh, (not all are mapped). I've been wandering around there for over 60 years.
Regards Bernard.

Hi,
I removed self intersection of ways, tweaked path lines and added a bridge, plus a few more tweaks. Thus to overcome anomalies in this changeset.

Regards Bernard

Hi,
I notice that all your changeset comments are identical, they lack any meaningful content. As such the comments are of no meaningful use to other contributors or the OSM project. Please see here:- osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
for an explanation of good changeset comments. Follow the advice and you'll increase the value of your edit for yourself and your fellow mappers.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I squared up the buildings to make them neater, tweaked/corrected a few. More than one house in a building then it can be tagged building=residential, either that or terrace the building.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I don't think this change worked out as you intended, it dragged a fence and woods line out of alignment. I've reverted the change so there's no harm done. Need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, For some reason the carpark was mapped as a multipolygon being two joined sections of way. Thus the tags were correctly on the multipolygon, I had placed the tags from the POI onto the multipolygon.
There is no actual need for the carpark to be mapped as a multipolygon so I've deleted it. Then joined the two sections into a regular polygon and transferred all tags onto it. I think it's now as require.

Regards Bernard

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Sorry to say that your changes dragged highways and kerbs greatly out of shape, also made the planter half a mile long.
In order to be certain of getting features back to their original position I've reverted your changes.
If you need help with something please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Removed several nodes tagged as crossing where there does not appear to be an actual crossing feature on the ground.
Regards Bernard

Hi, I've removed a few highways that you've duplicated. When a feature needs correcting/amending please do the edit to any existing features. This will ensure all history is kept and avoid duplication. I hope you are not copying from an OS walking map (1:25000 or 1:50000) as this will infringe copyright and is unacceptable on OSM.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
There's no need for the mapped car park area and a car park POI, it's just duplication of data.

Regards Bernard.

Hello Paula,
The problems highlighted by OSM Inspector look like they are all corrected. However there may still be the odd traffic hump that has an area dragged to it joining the hump, area and road together, this is a possible error but not classed as incorrect. (I just found corrected one such on Chaseville Park Road, school area was dragged to the hump.) Anyway looks good now and thanks for adding the traffic humps.

If you could detail the precise actions you used to map the humps in this changeset I might be able to work out what went wrong. I wouldn't use the "Join to way tool". An easy way to add traffic humps it to add a node to the existing highway line, precisely position it, then tag it.

Hang on, while writing this I've been trying to make JOSM create these anomalies. It appears that if you are zoomed out to far the join function will malfunction. Further if you have more than one node selected/highlighted then it is even more bizarre. So at least in some of your cases you could have had JOSM zoomed out to far when using the join tool.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, No response so I've removed the duplicated highways and tagged the two routes as best I can.

Hi, Please see my comments on your previous changeset regarding these POI. here :- changeset/90039567
The tagging of the two POI does not have a meaning as far as OSM is concerned. I explained the reason in my previous comment. If you could explain what you are trying to achieve maybe I could help with a suggestion.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've added a few more tags to the area and used normal naming for the name tag, (not all capital letters).
The area is a recreation ground as suggested by it's name. Tagged correctly as landuse=recreation_ground it's rendered properly.
added the play area and no dogs tag.
Regards Bernard.

Hello Paula,
I'm pretty sure I've corrected all the problems that appeared on the first link (OSM Inspector Geometry, self intersections). But, this morning, OSM Inspector Routing, duplications has been updated and it shows a mass of duplicated sections of ways. (please see here :- https://tinyurl.com/yy4lb95t ).
Bear with me and I'll work through them. Please don't make to correct while I go through them or we'll have more problems.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've added more detail to your POIs so they are more useful to folk and can be searched for on OSM. Please check the info is correct.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, There seem to be differing anomalies of the same happening. Some highway nodes are joined to areas of which some are associated with humps. Others are on highways where you've added humps.

It looks like you are creating a node, tagging it then joining it to the highway. If you then drag that node to another (better) position that move drags the highway line. Perhaps you are doing this without noticing it? However with some dragged nodes (thus self intersection of highway) there is not the expected tagged hump, though it is on the ground. Have you removed some humps because they look wrong?

I think it would be best if you limit features edited/added to one highway at a time, one highway edit one upload. This way you/I might be able to figure it out.

Of the many edits though a lot of them haven't been with mistakes so that's a good point.

You might when adding humps find it easier to add the node to the highway then tag that node. By the way some of these features are humps and some are tables.

Regards Bernard.

Hello Paula,
I've actually just now started rectifying some of the problems (starting at the south east). I'm correcting the self intersections marked on the link I sent and also amending the wider area. Re-aligning highways, un-joining highways from area lines and generally improving to the now very good aerial imagery.

With respect, it's a bit difficult doing this un-picking/amending of differing features. I'm happy to carry on with it but would understand your wish to make the corrections. So shall I carry on, it will take a day or two. Then if you make a just a few changes/edits on a changeset I could have a look at them. (It's always good to only have a few changes in an upload/changeset then you've a better chance to see mistakes.) In this changeset you made changes to over 350 features si stood no chance of seeing mistakes.

I'm running on, what do you think.
Regards Bernard.