Hi, its best to tag the shop and name to disused. Folk can then easily see what was there and not inadvertently re-tag the old details.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately you forgot to tag these two features. Neither of them seem to coincide with specific features seen on any imagery. Could you please modify the outlines and add tags.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
You are duplicating and crossing over sections of paths, Way: 751321281 and Way: 86100684. Where path lines coincide (the cartpath is on the same position as the footpath), they should be a single way that has all descriptive tags.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Google Maps cannot legally be used as a source for adding data to the OpenStreetMap database. Therefore, (to avoid any confusion), it is best not to mention the name at all.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Way: Beaulieu - The Oaks Collection (751063003) is not a building, it looks like housing estate. Could you please amend your tagging.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The area you changed is made up of individual private gardens. So I've reverted your changes from publicly accessible park back to private garden. Of course if you can show the area has been formally changed to a public park then I apologise and will accept your finding.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted your fictional changes from the database.
Please try to avoid adding fiction, (there are sites where you can experiment/test in this way) but not here. Remember you may one day have to rely on other services using this data to help you.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just a couple of helpful pointers. In the online iD editor if you select the Maxar imagery from the layers menu on the right if the screen it gives a more upto date picture. There are buildings on that image so you could more precisely place number 36.

Also if you select your building then right click, a drop down menu allows to square up the feature.

Regards Bernard.

The name "Water treament facility" is removed and tag man_made=wastewater_plant is added.

Hi, you inadvertantly joined the farmland to the center line of the track. I amended this and also removed the name, (I doubt the area is formally named "Farmland").

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You inadvertently remove place=village and added leisure=park to the residential area. I've reverted the changes.

I also separated the path from joining areas.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've amended the tags to building=yes.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately tagging description details onto a highway is not the way to add a business to OSM.

You need to precisely place a node and tag it with the data. There is help within the online iD editor, click the question symbol right side of the editor.

I have removed the tag from the highway. If you need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Please try not to connect/join highways to area outlines.

You joined service road Way: 747078250 to the multipolygon outline instead of Buccleuch Dock Road. I've corrected it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've made several amendments to cap park Way: 587931906

Separated service roads from perimeter line, added ways inside the car park, joined exit roads to the Dock Road.

On the big car park there were also many duplicated section of road I removed.

If you are near the area perhaps you could check the entrance/exit to the car parks.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Sorry to say there's lots of mistakes in this changeset.

You've tagged 13 instances of area=yes which should be building=yes.

Also twice tagged a building node with addr:street=Rubens Gate. There's not usually any need to tag a building node.

Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks for making the correction.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, it's really a good practice to acknowledge that comments have been noticed and acted upon, or not acted upon as the case maybe.
We're all after making the best map possible and should be working together to achieve this.

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've deleted the park.

Hi, I've amended your tagging to suit OSM practice of disused:shop and description=Vacant Building.

Is the ATM still in use? If not it also should be tagged as disused.

Please consider the comments I made on two previous change-sets you made.

Regards Bernard