Hi, you forgot to finish enclosing the grassland polygon Way: 752756963
I've removed several self intersections from it.
Regards Bernard

Fixed

OK I've made the changes for you.
Regards Bernard

Hi,
I've amended the address adding the house number and made Shenley Hill the street name instead of the house name.
Are you sure the POI is correctly positioned though as it's not placed on a building? Might it even be the other side of the road?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, you placed the building Newbury Conservative Club (53281103, v6) on the center line of a highway. That might be a good place for it but it's a hazard for traffic. Could you correct the position please.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Sorry to say this is not the way to add road names. The road name should be that of the road only. Any description or instruction should go on a different tag.
Could you please remove the "Via" descriptions from the road names. Thanks.

Hi, I've removed the relation and made the two sections into one building, then placed the tags on the building. Much simpler and to OSM practice.
I removed house number tags as you had put city name there.
What is Way: VSS Bank Malligawad (753053725), a bank, a shop or both? The tags should show what it actually is.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, If you square the buildings up they look a lot neater.
Regards Bernard,

Hi Tony, I would think some info should go on the bridge and some on a mile marker node.

No response so I've removed it.

No response so I've removed them.

Hi, re Way: 402053671 in this changeset, an area with long self intersection tails. I can't make out the area it was meant to cover. Could you have a look at it please.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, I added a road from the street to the car park service roads so as to join your new roads to the overall highway network. Other wise your roads would have been isolated islands.
Regards Bernard.

It's just what I think, so I pose the question. You placed it there, is it in the correct position? If so all well and good, sorry to have troubled you.

Hi, Deleting and redrawing features is not to OSM best practice as the previous history of features is lost. Far better is to amend, add or adjust what is already mapped, then all OSM history for those features is maintained.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I think you've got this business in the wrong place! Could you please check and amend the position?
Regards Bernard.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just a few pointers. The bridge here is already mapped, it is the structure that carries the highway over the railway. The tagging on your new node on the rail line indicates a second bridge which does not exist, the rail line is not the bridge.

I would suggest that the bridge number refers to the structure, not a point on the rail line. Therefore the number ought to go on the actual bridge structure.

Your ref number is an Ordnance Survey reference number. If it has been obtained, (by the yourself or the rail authorities), from OS data then you need specific permission from OS to use it, otherwise you may be breaching copyright.

For all tags the key is always lower case so milage not Milage. With no other reference 35m 68ch does not mean much to a non railway operator. If there is a mile mark then perhaps this page will help :- railway=milestone

Regards Bernard

Hi, Is there a physical presence here, like an shop/office that customers can visit? Or is this an online only business?

If it's online only then the shop tag should be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Is there a physical presence here, like an shop/office that customers can visit? Or is this an online only business?

If it's online only then the shop tag should be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Your fictional golf bunker is removed.