Hi, I've consolidated the info from the POI onto the building, thus avoiding duplication of data.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I can see no evidence of solar panels from any imagery of solar panels on the building, are you sure of your information? If so could you please explain where/how you got the information.
Regards Bernard.

Hello,
I wonder if you could please look at possible duplication or even triplication of a platform which seems to be the three ways :- Way: 153273856
Way: Platform 1 (50682502)
Way: 151948068

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your tag building:levels=0 on the Climbing Wall means it does not exist, building:levels=?? is to indicate the levels that the building contains, please see :- building:levels=*

I wonder if the area you've drawn is actually correct. Aren't there other businesses within the area you've drawn. It could be better to indicate the climbing wall as a POI. If the is one entrance specifically for the Wall then tag the entrance as your POI.

Regards Bernard.

Review.
Hi the building can be squared up and if you zoom in it can be depicted more accurately. I've done this for you.
Regards Bernard.

Hello Andy,
I was removing some sections of duplicated highways mostly by the same contributor so likely inadvertent duplications.

I noticed the neighbourhood outline was actually triplicated, again by the one contributor, so I removed two of the outlines.

I don't think I did anything to cause any concern, (war is rather a harsh term for these matters). Anyway I've reverted my changeset and may well look again at the inconsistencies in the area.

Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There are a few problems with your contribution to OSM.

The position of the POI does not relate to the address, it's beside a different road some 200 yards away from Cricketers Lane. The format of address tagging is not to OSM practice.

Putting your advert in the POI description and changeset comment is really bad form, it's absolutely unnecessary as you've added your website.

You've not indicated what is at these premises, clinic or office. Your website does not indicate any premises of any kind at all. Is this house the company office, is it a physical presence available to the public?

Could you please address these problems, if you need any help just ask.

Regards Bernard

Please don't draw and tag areas (the playground) then place a node (POI) inside the area with the same tags. It's unnecessary duplication. Could you please remove the POI?

Regards Bernard.

A lot of the footpaths you have added along the east side of Kings Road are entirely fiction. I have previously removed these when I added the short service roads.

You've also moved some of the remaining service roads and added fictional crossing points.

Similarly on the north side of Wrose Road you have added a second footpath which is fiction. As is the duplicate crossing point on Plumpton Walk.

Please don't add fiction to OSM you can clearly see from current imagery that the footpath is between the garden walls and grassed area separate from Kings Road. There are no footpaths beside the service that cross the grassed areas. However pedestrians can use the service roads.

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've reverted the change.

Hi, You're now duplicating paths, seemingly not seeing the paths and bridges that are already mapped. Could you please remove your duplications? Thanks.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I can find no reference to a park formally named Vardon Road field, As you have placed the POI amid houses I've removed it because it's obviously incorrect.

If you can verify the name even as locally used and correctly place it or even map the feature that would be good. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It's not OSM best practice to map and name a building then place a POI within it containing the identical information. This is just unnecessary duplication of data. Thus I've removed the two pub POI.

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've changed that feature but a lot of it was deleted.

Hi, you may consider Brittons Playing Field to be a park but it is obviously used for informal recreation therefore the landuse is recreation ground. An are can be both a park and recreation ground. I've reinstated the removed tag.

I'm sure the residents of the flats would not like the grass area beneath their windows being called a park. a park is for public use. These grass areas are usually communal areas for residents only giving them some privacy and a degree of separation from the public. I've reverted this change.

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Can you say why you've joined a bridge and two paths to a stream at Node: 6290173069? If it's a mistake could you please rectify it?

Also you've joined the carpark (Way: 733558826) to a footpath (Way: 689383959) and a highway crossing point (Node: 6467123569). Could you please rectify this?

I've removed the unnecessary wood relation making just a polygon (Way: 733558809).

I've removed the unnecessary playground relation making just a polygon (Way: Harrow Lodge Park Play Area (733558811).

I've removed some paths from joining onto area nodes.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've tagged the area Way: 733448236 as graveyard and removed the park tag. This area may appear open but it is not a park, it's an area for human burial.

Hi, Some of the parks you've mapped are not parks in the sense that OSM treats leisure=park as areas open to the public.

Especially the ones you mapped on the Audley End Estate, this land is termed as parkland (landscaped farm land within the private estate) not open to the public by right. These areas are parkland not park areas.

I've found several websites inviting permissive walking on paths/tracks on the Estate. But not any describing access to the paths you marked at the east side of the Estate. Could you please say where your information comes from, are the paths formally permissive?

I'm concerned that other parks are not really parks in any formal sense.

Regards Bernard.

Park tag added to the existing castle area.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Could you please show how your new track (Way: 329710942) crosses the stream (Way: The Slade (391947587)), bridge or ford?

Regards Bernard.