Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.
There is already a cafe mapped here so I have removed your duplicate POI.
If there are changes to the POI please amend the original POI thus keeping all history.

Regards Bernard.

Again you inadvertently dragged a node out of place, I've returned it no harm done.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, sorry to say this cafe was already mapped so I've removed your duplicate.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, you dragged a kerb node out of place, I've returned it no harm done but please be careful when uploading changes.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've amended your opening hours tag to suit OSM best practice. Please see opening_hours=*

Regards Bernard.

Hi, while looking at a separate issue I noticed that Node: 5760942541 and Node: 5760942538 (highway=traffic_signals), Node: 5760942542 (cycleway=asl) are placed in buildings on Sackville Street.

Regards Bernard

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've placed you incline data on the section of Canonbie Road, as per incline=*

I can see your good intention but is the name really Steep hill, and I doubt it is strictly a natural peak.
Are you sure of your elevation data (ele=18 meters), if this is correct and verifiable it the tag should be placed on an appropriate highway node.
So the POI can then be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Small problem, you added the shop=window_blind to the whole residential building outline. (A very large shop.)
I also notice this is a long way from changeset comment of "Across Indonesia".

I've reverted the changes, if you can explain what you wish to achieve maybe someone can help.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, I agree the barrier should not have been on Harlow Road. But my concern is, that the County Council map does not show a barrier here, nor can I see any other evidence on the web showing a barrier here. Hence my question, is there actually a physical barrier here? If not then the barrier should be removed.

Have you actually seen the barrier? Because maybe it was mistake to place a barrier anywhere here.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, the landuse tag should be used to describe the predominant use of the land and ought not be used in place of any amenity. The more usual predominant use of land surrounding a church is that of interring bodies or remains of bodies.

In the case of grave yards tagging amenity=grave_yard
surface=grass or (if the grass is naturally growing) natural=grassland will have the same outcome you desire but be more accurately descriptive.

As far as I am aware the grounds at St Michael Coslany remain consecrated thus are a grave yard, but are only a small portion of the grassed area.

Regards Bernard

Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I don't really understand your changeset comment. You have put a barrier on Rowney Gardens blocking access to it from Harlow Road. Is there a physical barrier here? If not it should be removed.

If you can explain what it is you are trying to accomplish maybe someone can help.

Regards Bernard.

Hi there, can you please change your changeset comments to reflect the actual changes please?
This changeset has nothing to do with "#hotosm-project-5501 #CycloneGaja #India Completing road network"

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are you sure these addresses are correct? If so will you please state the source of your information? Thanks.

Regards Bernard

Removed fiction pokemon park, this area is part of the market place, stalls and parking.

Remove landuse=grass from graveyard as this indicates the land being actually used for grass growing which it is not, if any thing landuse=cemetery.

One grass tag removed, no need for two.

Fiction removed.

Hi, I have removed your fiction pokemon park from the church grounds. By adding fiction you are not playing the game correctly.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the duplicate recreation ground you added, correctly tagged the area as landuse=recreation_ground.

Returned the bus stop you moved back to the correct position. Please be careful as it's easy to make inadvertent editing.

Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM is a live real time worldwide database from which thousands of maps are compiled. Thus it is crucial that the data is correct and verifiable, the data you added does not conform to OSM best practice. Further it is likely to corrupt the rendering of some applications.

The OSM database is not the place for testing, this can be done offline or on specific test sites.

Thus I have removed your tests from the database and hope you can refrain from adding more tests.

If you need help on a project please just ask.

Regards Bernard.