Hi, Yes that's right so what is the building? building=house, what type of house? house=semidetached.

Or it is accepted to use only building=semidetached_house, I prefer the former.

Regards Bernard.

All of the fictional motorways are removed. Please only add genuine features, thanks.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Just to let you know that the whole building block of 9 houses is termed as a terrace. If the terrace is named then the terrace can be mapped and named.

In this case, as you've drawn the individual houses in the terrace, the correct tagging for each house would be building=house
house=terraced. I've amended the tags for this terrace.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Personal information is best not uploaded to OSM, as the world can then see your problems. It's best kept offline. Thus I've reverted these changes for you.

Please feel free to add any genuine verifiable features. Need any help please just ask.

Regards.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

That's not a highway so it's been removed. It looks like a garden, would you care to explain what you're trying to achieve?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, you somehow duplicated a few highways, I've removed the duplicates keeping your new data on existing ways

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reinstated the designation tags to Oughtonhead Lane because it's a public highway and access is designated. The tag motor_vehicle=no is kept.

I've also reinstated the access to Coopers Yard as this is a service road so there will be access.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You placed several paths on top of existing highways, this makes duplication of highways which disrupts routing. I've removed all the duplicate highways.

If a highway needs correcting/amending please do the correction to the existing highway. It is not correct to draw a highway on top of another.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks for your first contribution to the world's best map. Unfortunately, you made a couple of highway duplications. I've made some amendments to the junction, please have a look to make sure there are no more problems.

Regards Bernard.

I forgot I also map any additional features I see on my daily walks.

Hi, No trouble, glad to help. This one was spotted here: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-0.64019&lat=53.93099&zoom=7&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

I do a lot of checking daily with OSM Inspector. Great Britain I check daily for Geometry mistakes. Then for Routing I check for duplicated edges, (this will highlight duplicated highways). I look at all of GB, and several other countries.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've managed to restore the forest area. There are now many long sections of area outlines that you have drawn a footpath on top of. Can these all be removed?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You placed some sections of footpath on top of existing service roads. Thus making duplicated sections of highway which disrupts routing.

It's OSM practice to correct/ amend existing objects where necessary, not draw over or delete the existing objects, this is to maintain the history of objects.

I've removed the duplicates and amended the existing ways to accommodate your new info.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've looked at several of your recent changesets and there are many problems. It might be best not to upload more for the time being but go back to rectify the issues.

Regards Bernard

You've deleted part of a forest area outline and tagged the remaining part as a footpath.

Hi, Please be aware of the many warnings given above about problems with these edits.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The tag highway=road is not valid, the highway tag should = the highway status, (trunk, residential, etc.).

The tag building=house indicates a single dwelling. It looks like these buildings are all two dwellings. As such the tag should be building=residential. If you divide the building into separate dwellings then each part can be tagged building=house.

Lastly, why have you deleted a footpath that can clearly be seen on imagery?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks, I see you've made an amendment. It's OSM practice to continue the comments here, rather than on another changeset which would not normally have been noticed.

Anyway on Changeset: 141445069 you ask for feedback.

OK, the general access would be yes rather than permissive because it is in an open area with presumed access for the public.

Being situated outside you should not tick the box "Located inside a building".

Situated outside as it is and always accessible then opening_hours=24/7 is tagged.

Lastly, the POI should be joined to the wall.

I've made the amendments but please check that all I've stated is correct. I'm not local but am assuming my points from your comments.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I notice that you've removed the building outline, has it been demolished? If not, and it's only the company that's no longer there, then the building and its address should remain. The company name and amenity should be tagged as disused so that other folk can see the disused information and not mistakenly re-map it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks for adding the public defibrillator. Is it actually inside the building as placed on the map? If it's outside (as I would think) is it attached to the building wall? The information in your changeset comment above will not be available on a rendered map. So this info should be placed on the POI tags. Please see here for help tagging defibrillators: emergency=defibrillator

Need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.