Duplicated highway removed.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately this changeset dragged lots of areas out of alignment. It also introduced an untagged line joining the 3 monuments. The 3 monuments are in the middle of fields, somewhat strange placements?

Thus I've reverted this changeset.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Your two new highways Way: B4382 (1215458354) and Way: B4382 (1215458353) are placed on top of other highways making duplication. Further I would ask if the 20mph limit has only recently been instigated as there is some evidence that it is or was 30mph?

Regards Bernard.

Fiction and duplicated highways are removed.

Hi, Sorry to say that a lot of this is incorrect mapping. Thus most is removed as it's fiction.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A couple of things to point out about OSM best practice. The address tags for the school should go on the school premises outline. The premises are tagged as amenity+school and all buildings within the premises are tagged as building=school. I've made a few amendments.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks for letting me know. Don't know how it happened as trial reversion of this changeset doesn't restore the missing section. Anyway, I've extended the cycleway so the relations are now OK.

Regards Bernard.

Duplicated highway removed

Hi, I've removed some untagged lines and duplicated sections of highways.

Hi, Thanks. I've now removed the single node and tweaked the building tags to suit OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OSM.

Another review, are there two buildings? Or should all tags be on the one building which you've drawn an area for? Another point, there is an existing node within your building area stating addr:housenumber=17, is that incorrect, can it be removed?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've somehow made a mistake here changing a road to tree row. Not to worry though I've reverted the change. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Graveyard removed, looks like a house.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The NAPTAN data (names and landmarks), that have been imported to OSM are not the local street names etc. It is data taken from an official database and is not necessarily meant to directly link to local names.

Therefore this NAPTAN data should not be amended unless the NAPTAN data has been changed. Thus I'll revert these changes except for your new data.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Lots of inadvertent mistakes in your mapping here, I've made many amendments as this is easier than trying to explain them all.

Please look at the "Tips for new mappers coming from Pokémon Go" here:- osm.wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers Also please take a look at the many pages of mapping help, if in doubt ask or look at how similar objects are mapped.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Nothing at all is unclear, there are not two gates.

There is no need whatever for duplication, as all your gate data and more can be tagged to either a node or a line. Your line only depicts the width of the gate, this width can be tagged to a node.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, If there are two gates, one atop the other then that's OK, that's how you've depicted them. I suspect though that there is only one gate at each position.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed a few duplicated sections of footpath on the Arran Coastal Path here.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, OK. It was tagged incorrectly, the name "to the pub and hotel" was also incorrect, that's a description. So it did need at the very least correcting. As no tags were right I removed it

Anyway, thanks for the explanation. Is it possible for you to map the service road? I could then check the tagging.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This just looks so wrong. It's definitely not a motorway junction, and it wouldn't be numbered anyhow. Then your motorway junction was inserted into 11 bus route relations.

It looks to me that the entrance to the hotel is mapped properly a little further south on High Road.

Thus I've reverted this changeset.

Regards Bernard.