Austin Zhu's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 62501581 | about 7 years ago | Thanks for your contribution! You can also refer to the Chinese tagging guidelines on wiki. Things are always complicated in China, for your information this highway is even a toll road, but function as an city expressway. Anyway thank you! |
| 62817289 | about 7 years ago | 您似乎删除了一些已有的数据在这个集合里,请您告诉我为什么需要删除这些数据,谢谢 |
| 62501581 | about 7 years ago | The Suyuzhang (Suzhou-Changshu-Zhangjiagang) Highway has been a city expressway since 2016. Meaning there's no crossings with other roads. Instead of primary we use trunk. Thank you! |
| 55770141 | over 7 years ago | 这些本身不是建筑,请参照后修改。谢谢 |
| 58449873 | over 7 years ago | It has already been completed in real world but the whole transport line is not opened currently. Thanks. |
| 55371484 | almost 8 years ago | 请勿在县级单位上填写人口,其所属地级市人口已经包含此县人口。
|
| 54842992 | almost 8 years ago | Sorry, I checked that and found nothing wrong, please ignore the above message. |
| 54842992 | almost 8 years ago | Please comply with the China tagging guideline. Some of your edits are wrong. For example: 苏虞张公路 is neither a G-class road nor a urban elevated expressway. Please check your edits.
|
| 55026174 | almost 8 years ago | Multiligual words in name tag is not recommended. Please use tag name:xx instead. In this case the node already have separate tags for multilanguages. Please refer to China tagging guidelines on osm wiki.
|
| 53790211 | almost 8 years ago | Because it is unnecessary to do so. Simplified Chinese is the official language of mainland China. And they already have the name: ug (maybe) tags. FYI, I seldom see other multilingual countries do so, such as India. See china tagging guideline page on OpenStreetMap wiki. Greetings
|
| 54392091 | about 8 years ago | 您删除了道路属性,请勿进行错误编辑,谢谢! |
| 54353732 | about 8 years ago | Hey! What are you doing here? Why did you tag all the road tertiary then revert them? |
| 54064424 | about 8 years ago | hope if you can assist Chinese mappers clean those multilanguage names!(esp in Guangdong) |
| 51813682 | about 8 years ago | i also referred to the construction diagram of it |
| 51813682 | about 8 years ago | Sentinel-2 imagery, sorry i'm lazy to change the source every time |
| 53171164 | about 8 years ago | Actually, I didn't do so. In this changeset I added capital=yes. |
| 52594604 | about 8 years ago | 是的。。。 |
| 52480715 | about 8 years ago | My answer is yes. I don't know which primary route you are referring to, if that primary route connects several provinces, then I have to reconsider that issue. Currently, Freedsky and I am doing this changing manually ( because some G-routes have been diverted to newer roads). We hope foreigners can understand the situation in China and follow the guidelines, which would be a great support. Our tagging it as a trunk is similar to that of Japan. You know Japanese tag their national route trunk, so do we.
|
| 52480715 | about 8 years ago | I don't think so. All G-network roads should be tagged trunk, Chinese contributors have agreed on that. And they are not replaced. The expressways are new G roads with higher construction standards. There's nothing called old network. Trunk is mainly used for national road system (all G-nnn roads) and elevated roads in cities. Please see China tagging guidelines. |
| 52480715 | about 8 years ago | If it is currently a member of the G-network, then it should be tagged with trunk. |