Arthtoach's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 89234596 | almost 2 years ago | Looks like a mistake, I've removed the tag. |
| 144638160 | about 2 years ago | I've fixed this. |
| 144638160 | about 2 years ago | Thanks for spotting this, my mistake. |
| 113031493 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, good spot. No idea how I've made such a complete mess of this building, presumably I was trying to change building=house to building=yes but I've somehow invented a new tag with the help of JOSM's automcomplete. I've fixed it now to just have the tag building=yes. Thanks! |
| 83420801 | over 5 years ago | Yes, you are correct. I realised this after doing this a few times. Have fixed this one in changset 83426339, will fix any other cases where I've done this shortly. Thanks! |
| 81068525 | almost 6 years ago | Actually adding buildings (not adding details to highways). |
| 79119651 | almost 6 years ago | I have continued this discussion on changeset/79465541 Please respond. |
| 79465541 | almost 6 years ago | Accidentally recorded the above comment with the wrong account. This is my normal account. |
| 78405391 | about 6 years ago | Wrong changeset description. Actually adding buildings. |
| 75949475 | about 6 years ago | Changeset description should have been: Adding buildings to LS15 area. |
| 75949587 | about 6 years ago | Changeset description should have been: Adding buildings to LS15 area. |
| 75949639 | about 6 years ago | Changeset description should have been: Adding buildings to LS15 area. |
| 70997513 | over 6 years ago | Incorrect changset details.
|
| 67519668 | almost 7 years ago | Source is actually Esri. |
| 61891389 | about 7 years ago | Suggested improvements made in changeset/64105874. |
| 61891389 | about 7 years ago | Hi, thanks for the feedback. Was clearly being a bit overzealous trying to ensure everywhere was covered by landuse or amenity! Obviously this needs a proper survey, but in the meantime here's a suggestion for how I improve the situation:
Does this seem sensible? |
| 51884385 | over 8 years ago | Apologies, I checked that 01539 was a valid area code, not relalising there was a more specific one. I've changed this back. |