Gotcha, sorry for messing it up and thanks for fixing it.

for the changeset: Just to change the name from 'anmial' to 'animal'. for the way: not sure, didn't make it...it may in fact be useless and worth deleting but I didn't want to be the one to make that call.

Fair.

Nice, are you aware of OpenDroneMap / OpenAerialMap? These make it easy to convert drone footage into tiled, orthorectified imagery consumable by iD or JOSM.

I think you mean that there are bigger meat without feet to fry. But yes, I agree with Minh -- a belated welcome to OSM!

Quite aside from OSM's policies about this, but what does 'meat without feet' mean? Is that referring to a fish?

I see, thank you, Peter. I apologise for presuming it was your doing (it's difficult to tell post-deletion, although not impossible with specialised tools).

Hi, I see your profile says you are an "Expert geographer with more than 20 years experience in making maps. including ensuring that the maps correctly represent the disputed views from country to country." Is it disputed whether way/415257063 is a school or a catchment area?

You should be aware that object names show up on the map, and private info (not related to a business or other public place) is liable to be removed.

thanks!

Got it. The use of ele:ft=* seems like a good way to preserve the significant figures, but I'll convert the main ele=* tags later today when I get time.

I'm not troubled by bespoke tagging, the real world has many idiosyncrasies and attempting 100% consistency has diminishing returns in any case. Of course, being an open database I welcome anyone who wants to emend the objects I touch; likewise I am happy to respond to changeset comments.

To answer your questions, the label remains accurate but dominates the osm-carto display for Lamy. I am of course aware of the caveat against attempting to satisfy the oddities of any particular data consumer, but perhaps consider it a placeholder tag while I understand why it is given such undue cartographic emphasis and how that can be rectified. The 'especially large' language you quote seems an important clue that I should look for another schema to denote a sculptural object that serves a primarily commemorative purpose (although not one related to the surroundings except indirectly, via the operator). You are correct, incidentally; it is merely perhaps a meter and a half tall.

Good catch on the second concern, I think the appropriate key would be `inscription:url`.

I thought that the image provider tags used merely a unique ID instead of a complete URI, rather like `wikidata` versus a more generic website key. But your point is well taken that the same basic info is encoded either way and can safely be deduplicated.

Speaking of the KartaView image, it is a faithful depiction of the appearance of the object, but as far as the portrayed setting, that is outdated (from when it was across the road from where it is now).

Thanks for adding these roads!

thanks, that typo consistently haunts my spelling.

I missed your return to OSM a couple months ago, but anyway a belated welcome back! Hope you and Jason et al. too are doing well.

Hi! Are you aware of access=permit ? This may help your acquaintance out by appropriately changing the rendering on some downstream maps consuming OSM data. access=private is a good alternative, of course.

Thanks for the edit. It was a subjective tag and therefore inappropriate for OSM, but 'troll tagging' means something different: osm.wiki/wiki/trolltag

Thanks for your contribution! Google Maps doesn't draw from OSM so it may be awhile yet before they display it, but many other maps across the web do use OSM and update at different frequencies.

Can you confirm if the Kmart is still active? (also asked at changeset/69437088)

Can you confirm if the Kmart is still active? (also asked at changeset/69438837)