Note some of the opened intersections were confirmed from Aerial Drone Footage form this channel: https://www.youtube.com/@colindobson4045

changeset/175012312

Fixed in this changeset: 175012312.

Hey Jake, all the dates here have the wrong year, should be 2025

Hi uftyv,

I recognise you are a relatively new user. It is known that if trees are already mapped they should remain so, this has been discussed here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/trees-to-tree-rows/93890/2. Also if you wished to add tree rows (which i will maintain should just be a individual straight way not a polygonal way) you could still do so by just adding a way ontop to denote that fact. natural=tree_row

Hi this is unnecessary, these trees are not dense enough nor would they be considered a tree row. Each tree was identified and plotted. Using a tree row removes a significant amount of information that was collected. Ideally we want to turn tree rows into individual trees. Tree rows are only placed where there wasn't information of trees mapped before. I ask that this changeset be reverted. If ou have any questions you can post them in the oceania discord for discussion.

Correction, I did know the operator, Thompson Health Care, the name is St Ives House.

https://thompsonhealthcare.com.au/our-homes/st-ives-house/

Hi Andrew, this building iş another senior care facility named Thompson House iirc. I do not know the operator off by memory as I am writing this.

Yeah okay, plus there is definitely addresses to add in that were missing. I am aware the coles development may have actually changed its address too. But thats from application documents. Not sure where Ill get the actual address from within compliance.

Its weird because these were some of the last I replaced and I know I used the tool. Now I want to revert and fix this...

Ah did I delete some? I was sure I only used the replace geometry tool.

I am not familiar with the driveway, but its possible connected with the one way accessway which I created here (i just joined the two links you had together and aligned it. Ive known this has always been a one way passthrough for the many years I visit the GPs. However Ive only ever taken notice at the link not the driveway you note. Did you have clearer imagery than DCS?

Heyo, is there a reason or justification you can provide for this significant changeset. This amount of roads being upped to 'primary' is a big change especially as a first contribution.

Yeah I'm not sure where you are seeing those numbers, but I am aware of some cottages on Coxs Rd also using divisions of the 120 address. So you might be right with the one on Wicks Rd as well. Ill have a check though which buildings it actually refers to tho because the DCS geocoding doesn't point to the right spots correctly because the hospital footprint is made up of multiple land parcels.

@aharvey please check but I have replaced them most known with osm.wiki/Tag:ref=. Shame that despite the refs appearing on iD they arent visible on OSM basemap

I thought about using ref and checked some articles about the issue which noted i should use house number, but yes they are sort of used in addressing since our deliveries are usually made out to the individual building of the entire campus (sort of like a unit number)

Yep okay thats what I thought, seems others have used it in the wrong way then, I can easily copy paste that then.

What would be your suggestion for numbering the buildings since technically they are not an address number. Just a building ref number for the main address of 51 wicks rd.

Ah okay, good to know, its a shame though, cause that is what I feel atm is that while the general structure of OSM is reliable the map has definitely gotten fractured with confusing components.

Why have it as a boundary rather than an area? Can it be switched to an area so it shows properly in editor?

Yeah, that should be via Imagery, you can actually see it through the trees, the rocky surface of the ford allows it to be seen.