OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
133045181 almost 3 years ago

Very clever dogwhistle! Surely DWG won't take action against this sort of changeset comment.

132944042 almost 3 years ago

The building named "House" that is clearly a detached house didn't raise any flags?

132890734 almost 3 years ago

Make sure to square buildings after drawing them by selecting them and pressing Q.

132885640 almost 3 years ago

It it really an old name? In my experience, the TIGER names often exist, but are on the wrong road. Whatever the case, it seems unlikely that this ever had a name.

4226716 almost 3 years ago

Might be good to come back and square these now that we have better editing tools.

132926793 almost 3 years ago

Oh hey, that's my building!

It's not showing in my edit history on Bing Map builder yet and I haven't received an email.

132909213 almost 3 years ago

It seems more likely to be a bollard than a gate, presumably blocking an emergency access. Do you have any street-level imagery to confirm?

132827453 almost 3 years ago

Then your intentionally poor edits will be referred to the DWG.

132827453 almost 3 years ago

This is not an answer. Please fix the obvious issues with your edits.

132815594 almost 3 years ago

This is not an appropriate attitude. It is not our responsibility to decipher what you're trying to do. This is a collaborative platform.

132864611 almost 3 years ago

Nope, just SEO spam. This is a private residence.

132690144 almost 3 years ago

These would probably more accurately be mapped as building parts. From the looks of the roof (totally seamless between many of the roofs) they are likely just rooms.

132655810 almost 3 years ago

Hello, this entry is located at a private residence. If a physical storefront is not present, that is accessible to any visitor, the feature is not suitable for inclusion on OpenStreetMap. Based on the information present on the linked website, this is not the case. I have removed the entry. Please let me know if this is in error.

132119064 almost 3 years ago

Was it disincorporated?

And if the population is zero, shouldn't the node be retagged to place=locality?

132345292 almost 3 years ago

Uh... don't do it again, I guess? And it would be good to fix existing edits.

67213482 almost 3 years ago

I surveyed the building, and it actually has three stories. I'll make these changes.

132345292 almost 3 years ago

This is a general rule that applies globally. It may be appropriate if addresses use a predirectional, like "South United States Highway 221A", but it is not the case here.

67213482 almost 3 years ago

I cannot find a source for the name "The Cruplex", on the ground, online, or otherwise. Is there any source besides the note?

132345292 almost 3 years ago

It is incorrect to add highway refs as names in most cases, such as "United States Highway 221A".

132286060 almost 3 years ago

It is preferred to tag single-family homes as building=detached.

Please use better changeset comments. I have asked too many times.