Allison P's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 133045181 | almost 3 years ago | Very clever dogwhistle! Surely DWG won't take action against this sort of changeset comment. |
| 132944042 | almost 3 years ago | The building named "House" that is clearly a detached house didn't raise any flags? |
| 132890734 | almost 3 years ago | Make sure to square buildings after drawing them by selecting them and pressing Q. |
| 132885640 | almost 3 years ago | It it really an old name? In my experience, the TIGER names often exist, but are on the wrong road. Whatever the case, it seems unlikely that this ever had a name. |
| 4226716 | almost 3 years ago | Might be good to come back and square these now that we have better editing tools. |
| 132926793 | almost 3 years ago | Oh hey, that's my building! It's not showing in my edit history on Bing Map builder yet and I haven't received an email. |
| 132909213 | almost 3 years ago | It seems more likely to be a bollard than a gate, presumably blocking an emergency access. Do you have any street-level imagery to confirm? |
| 132827453 | almost 3 years ago | Then your intentionally poor edits will be referred to the DWG. |
| 132827453 | almost 3 years ago | This is not an answer. Please fix the obvious issues with your edits. |
| 132815594 | almost 3 years ago | This is not an appropriate attitude. It is not our responsibility to decipher what you're trying to do. This is a collaborative platform. |
| 132864611 | almost 3 years ago | Nope, just SEO spam. This is a private residence. |
| 132690144 | almost 3 years ago | These would probably more accurately be mapped as building parts. From the looks of the roof (totally seamless between many of the roofs) they are likely just rooms. |
| 132655810 | almost 3 years ago | Hello, this entry is located at a private residence. If a physical storefront is not present, that is accessible to any visitor, the feature is not suitable for inclusion on OpenStreetMap. Based on the information present on the linked website, this is not the case. I have removed the entry. Please let me know if this is in error. |
| 132119064 | almost 3 years ago | Was it disincorporated? And if the population is zero, shouldn't the node be retagged to place=locality? |
| 132345292 | almost 3 years ago | Uh... don't do it again, I guess? And it would be good to fix existing edits. |
| 67213482 | almost 3 years ago | I surveyed the building, and it actually has three stories. I'll make these changes. |
| 132345292 | almost 3 years ago | This is a general rule that applies globally. It may be appropriate if addresses use a predirectional, like "South United States Highway 221A", but it is not the case here. |
| 67213482 | almost 3 years ago | I cannot find a source for the name "The Cruplex", on the ground, online, or otherwise. Is there any source besides the note? |
| 132345292 | almost 3 years ago | It is incorrect to add highway refs as names in most cases, such as "United States Highway 221A". |
| 132286060 | almost 3 years ago | It is preferred to tag single-family homes as building=detached. Please use better changeset comments. I have asked too many times. |