Hello, this entry is located at a private residence. If a physical storefront is not present, that is accessible to any visitor, the feature is not suitable for inclusion on OpenStreetMap. Based on the information present on the linked website, this is not the case. I have removed the entry. Please let me know if this is in error.

Was it disincorporated?

And if the population is zero, shouldn't the node be retagged to place=locality?

Uh... don't do it again, I guess? And it would be good to fix existing edits.

I surveyed the building, and it actually has three stories. I'll make these changes.

This is a general rule that applies globally. It may be appropriate if addresses use a predirectional, like "South United States Highway 221A", but it is not the case here.

I cannot find a source for the name "The Cruplex", on the ground, online, or otherwise. Is there any source besides the note?

It is incorrect to add highway refs as names in most cases, such as "United States Highway 221A".

It is preferred to tag single-family homes as building=detached.

Please use better changeset comments. I have asked too many times.

Please verify: is the suffix really Street? It seems to be listed by the county as Drive.

Thanks for adding these. In the area it is preferred to tag as building=detached to indicate they are single-family homes. Also note that there are address nodes present, and when the data is added to the houses the node should be deleted. By selecting both the address and the building, you can move the data and delete the point just by pressing C.

This turn restriction relation/15443553 says that people must make a U-turn here, meaning they can't go straight. This is obviously wrong.

Check this road segment, it is duplicating way/1138141578

If a road has two names, it is usually better to put the primary one as the name and the other name as alt_name.

One more: start_date is for the feature, not the company.

The number of the tee should be ref=*, not name=*.

W Germantown Pike -> West Germantown Pike?

According to wiki it's okay and appropriate to list the owner's name operator=*

Again, you've accidentally added the name to a node. It looks like you were able to figure out how to put it on the way, though. Let me know if you have any other questions!

The answer is that only a few parcels are still occupied, and the roads to them are still maintained. This is often the case with these abandoned townsites.

Here's how I mapped a similar situation: node/150938505 (see surrounding area)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! You have added the name to a road junction, rather than an actual road. Which road were you meaning to change the name of?

Also, note that road names are expanded on OpenStreetMap. This means all directions and suffixes should be spelled out (E -> East, Rd -> Road, etc.)

Here's another example (coincidentally also in Montana): https://www.google.com/maps/@48.5590927,-112.1249976,18z

https://toolecountymt.gov/pdf/commissioners_minutes/2020/10_29_2020_Commissioner_Minutes.pdf

In short, a road can disappear in a physical sense without ever being reflected in legal documents.