Allison P's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 128720545 | about 3 years ago | The section beyond the gate is not part of the public road, so the name should probably be removed. |
| 128407706 | about 3 years ago | Please expand road suffixes. They are easy for data consumers to shorten but difficult to expand. Thank you for adding these new subdivisions! |
| 118270135 | about 3 years ago | Some of these were demolished, like way/1038700453 |
| 51523937 | about 3 years ago | Sure, try Heavener. But this bulk edit also adds speed limits to crappy TIGER roads, like private driveways, forest tracks, and even just nonsense. Based on that I can't imagine the real roads' speed limit will be much better. |
| 51523937 | about 3 years ago | Am I really meant to believe that random suburban roads in the middle of towns have an unposted speed limit of 45? Not something lower imposed by the town? |
| 97000850 | about 3 years ago | Guess I missed West Avenue East (should be West Avenue E). Working on those now. |
| 128035436 | about 3 years ago | It is. You will see similar changeset comments from dozens of other Lyft editors. Would be nice if they tweaked the terminology, though. |
| 128035436 | about 3 years ago | "Proprietary" for Lyft meaning "provided to us for use in OSM but not the general public". |
| 117140453 | about 3 years ago | Do you know if the public bookcase is a particular brand? I am looking into getting all LFL bookcases in Ada County on OSM. Their map doesn't list a bookcase here, so I'm wondering if it's a brand I've never heard of or something independent. It's also possible the bookcase was taken down. Do you have any info? Thanks. |
| 127754986 | about 3 years ago | This is factually incorrect. Looking at the Greenville county assessor map this is not a legal road, just a service road. |
| 25200274 | about 3 years ago | Looks more like roads that were planned for subdivisions that never got platted |
| 127817508 | about 3 years ago | You have not responded to my previous changeset comments, which can result in being temporarily blocked from editing. Please use better changeset comments. |
| 127439688 | about 3 years ago | There is no island anymore. It was demolished about a year ago. Why did you readd? |
| 125755130 | about 3 years ago | units=88 on way/1091717204 is not a recognized tag. It is better to tag the number of units in each building with building:flats=*. |
| 127162220 | about 3 years ago | The building doesn't exist. It's another one of zluuzki's (fka Hiausirg) unapproved imports. It is visible on no aerial photos and despite not having a source tag, is from microsoft/buildingFootprints. VLD190 (and Facebook as a whole), you need to conduct sanity checks when you make these "fixes". What you did might suppress the error as reported by Atlas, but it does nothing to improve the underlying data quality, and in a sense actually worsens it because the error becomes more difficult to spot. This is not the first low-quality edit of this type I've seen. |
| 126963295 | about 3 years ago | This one took awhile, maybe 40 minutes. Quite a few duplexes here, interestingly, and some row houses. This suggests age, but despite this most street suffixes were standard. Overall challenging, but not by the era's standards. |
| 126678258 | about 3 years ago | It looks like that segment is a shared private driveway, so not part of the road. |
| 126634784 | about 3 years ago | Also, year should probably be start_date |
| 126634784 | about 3 years ago | I think it's more correct to have addr:unit just be 201. I don't believe it's typical to use a # or the unit prefix. |
| 118142681 | about 3 years ago | Last I checked, way/766547555 had two units, the other being an office for the nearby Popeyes. |