OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
128720545 about 3 years ago

The section beyond the gate is not part of the public road, so the name should probably be removed.

128407706 about 3 years ago

Please expand road suffixes. They are easy for data consumers to shorten but difficult to expand. Thank you for adding these new subdivisions!

118270135 about 3 years ago

Some of these were demolished, like way/1038700453

51523937 about 3 years ago

Sure, try Heavener.

But this bulk edit also adds speed limits to crappy TIGER roads, like private driveways, forest tracks, and even just nonsense. Based on that I can't imagine the real roads' speed limit will be much better.

51523937 about 3 years ago

Am I really meant to believe that random suburban roads in the middle of towns have an unposted speed limit of 45? Not something lower imposed by the town?

97000850 about 3 years ago

Guess I missed West Avenue East (should be West Avenue E). Working on those now.

128035436 about 3 years ago

It is. You will see similar changeset comments from dozens of other Lyft editors. Would be nice if they tweaked the terminology, though.

128035436 about 3 years ago

"Proprietary" for Lyft meaning "provided to us for use in OSM but not the general public".

117140453 about 3 years ago

Do you know if the public bookcase is a particular brand? I am looking into getting all LFL bookcases in Ada County on OSM. Their map doesn't list a bookcase here, so I'm wondering if it's a brand I've never heard of or something independent. It's also possible the bookcase was taken down. Do you have any info? Thanks.

127754986 about 3 years ago

This is factually incorrect. Looking at the Greenville county assessor map this is not a legal road, just a service road.

25200274 about 3 years ago

Looks more like roads that were planned for subdivisions that never got platted

127817508 about 3 years ago

You have not responded to my previous changeset comments, which can result in being temporarily blocked from editing. Please use better changeset comments.

127439688 about 3 years ago

There is no island anymore. It was demolished about a year ago. Why did you readd?

125755130 about 3 years ago

units=88 on way/1091717204 is not a recognized tag. It is better to tag the number of units in each building with building:flats=*.

127162220 about 3 years ago

The building doesn't exist. It's another one of zluuzki's (fka Hiausirg) unapproved imports. It is visible on no aerial photos and despite not having a source tag, is from microsoft/buildingFootprints.

VLD190 (and Facebook as a whole), you need to conduct sanity checks when you make these "fixes". What you did might suppress the error as reported by Atlas, but it does nothing to improve the underlying data quality, and in a sense actually worsens it because the error becomes more difficult to spot. This is not the first low-quality edit of this type I've seen.

126963295 about 3 years ago

This one took awhile, maybe 40 minutes. Quite a few duplexes here, interestingly, and some row houses. This suggests age, but despite this most street suffixes were standard. Overall challenging, but not by the era's standards.

126678258 about 3 years ago

It looks like that segment is a shared private driveway, so not part of the road.

126634784 about 3 years ago

Also, year should probably be start_date

126634784 about 3 years ago

I think it's more correct to have addr:unit just be 201. I don't believe it's typical to use a # or the unit prefix.

118142681 about 3 years ago

Last I checked, way/766547555 had two units, the other being an office for the nearby Popeyes.