Hmm, yeah, I only added the tag to untagged ways. I guess these weren't counted.

Individual sections of parking lots should not be mapped as amenity=parking. You can map individual spaces, but the lot as a whole is already there.

It is called the City of Placerville. https://placervilleidaho.org/

Furthermore, it is listed as a city on Wikipedia.

I have also visited Placerville. It is incorporated.

This "fix" also deleted the boundaries of Placerville, which is an incorporated city. relation/121371

Ways in a multipolygon normally don't need their own tags, like here. Only if something separate exists along a single way should it be tagged. In this case, that means that the outer way shouldn't have been tagged as a hospital building and the inner way not as area=yes.

Saw this coming. I don't think it's a good use of my time highlighting a few churches, hitting upload, then undownloading them and repeating with all 101 of them. I did it before with a similar edit, and it felt very unproductive.

The track was already mapped, you've just duplicated it here. I removed the tags for you.

I don't see any houses added in this changeset.

This is a private residence. Is there a reception desk or anything else that would entail a customer visiting this house? If not, the business does not belong on OpenStreetMap and must be deleted. It is only for businesses with a physical location. I look forward to your response.

Those edits were made a couple years apart by the same user. Perhaps they aren't informed about the tagging scheme for abandoned features?

Couldn't find an address listing on their website. May be a real business, but they didn't use any recognized tags. I'll give them a call if they try to add the business again.

I have surveyed the address before (a couple years ago); there was some other occupant.

Mount Bachelor is not a highway=crossing. Is this a test edit? No test edits are permitted on the main server under any circumstances. Try https://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org

In a previous comment, I explained not to do this. Not only did you not respond, you did this to many other apartments. Unless you can give a good reason for doing this, I will have to revert your changes.

The name "Apartment I" on changeset/120562660 is useless. It is already present in the address, and that is not the actual name, just a description.

Is this really a gravel path? It looks pretty informal, and other trails in the area are dirt.

It is a private residence. The business owner lives here. I don't know if those sorts of businesses really belong on OSM.

addr:country is usually unnecessary. Additionally, it should use the two letter country code.

Huh. Midnight editing will do that to ya...

(ترجمه ماشینی از انگلیسی) آیا "تست" نام واقعی است؟ way/948874451

(Machine translation from English) Is "test" a real name? way/948874451

Users have been blocked for unhelpful changeset comments in the past. It's not a criticism to point out that you should do something. I don't know what "other comment" you're referring to; this user hasn't commented on any other of your changesets.