Please check the location. 801 Everett Street should be four blocks away.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your edit! As requested, here's a review of your changeset.

The opening hour syntax is tricky to get right, but you have it down perfectly!

The phone number just needs a slight tweak. It should be in +<country code>-<area code>-<local number> format, in this case +1-208-373-0020.

I hadn't heard about the name change. Good to know!

Do not engage in further edit warring. I have already explained the issue with your edits. Any more edits of this nature will be reported to the Data Working Group.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Unfortunately, I have to revert your edits, because this is not the proper way to map a shopping center. In addition to the geometry being very inaccurate, this is a single building. If you have a floor plan that indicates the dimensions of each shop, you could map them as areas and add the address information. This geometry, however, is incorrect.

I have already explained the issue with partitioning the building in this way. Please do not map the shopping center like this again. Thank you.

This was constructed as a single building, so these subdivisions aren't really appropriate. Furthermore, the angles are not properly aligned.

I suggest mapping the individual shops as areas instead. They can be merged with the addresses to similar effect.

I don't think the peak is named in GNIS, but it looks like a local name in use: https://www.peakbagger.com/peak.aspx?pid=17030

Do not use the description for spam

image is used for pictures of the feature only, not company logos

Thank you for the additional info. The existing tags do not describe the feature, so I have updated them.

Cannot verify location

ChatGPT aside, you absolutely *can* learn how to maintain PT relations so that you avoid breaking them. I would argue that it is your duty to fix issues caused by you once you become aware of them.

There are plenty of ways to contribute to the map that don't require knowledge of route relations. You should stick to those if you're not willing to learn.

OpenStreetMap is a live database. Any consumers accessing a version of the data after you submit changes will see them reflected.

I have not visited the site since 2021, so I do not have local knowledge. The classification is based on publication of the final plat for Pera Place Subdivision on October 29, 2024. This is newer than the imagery. Access the plat here: https://adacountyassessor.org/docs/subdivisionplats/sub21000

Files: S2105701.tif through S2105705.tif

Use the parcel photos from the assessor's interactive map to verify that the road is complete. Example: https://apps.adacounty.id.gov/PropertyLookup/PropertyDetails?parcel=R6991101220&year=2025

Roads may be blocked in whole or in part while homes are under construction, but that would not be reflected in access tags or classification.

There is no consensus around such a thing.

The individual areas are probably better kept than putting landuse on a boundary. Ideally, the landuse would exclude the schools.

addr:city should not be in all caps, and addr:street should be fully unabbreviated (West 200 North, not W 200 N).

building=proposed is a trolltag, use lifecycle prefix proposed:building=retail and proposed:amenity=cafe

Spell out Ext as Extension

Interesting, this does not match up with the address given by the post office. It seems that they are incorrect. Perhaps this is the origin of the mistaken name.

Thank you for the additional research

It's Delevan. If the signs say otherwise, that is due to a typo.