"blue_turf" is not a distinct surface value. The color is already reflected in the colour tag.
The common name of the field that should be displayed on OpenStreetMap is Lyle Smith Field. Unless you have some sort of documentation proving otherwise, do not "correct" the name again. You will be referred to the Data Working Group.

Awesome work adding/updating all these tracks! I get really frustrated trying to fix TIGER geometry.

way/1229199662: Prophecy?

Looks like you tagged the entirety of way/458911987 as covered.

It looks like the URLs have the store number in them. Possible to extract refs?

Please submit changes before moving to a new area, especially across the country.

Then when asked to explain your edits, you should do so without fail. What did you do in this changeset? ("Look at it" is not a sufficient explanation.)

It is not. The stadium is already named properly. You are tagging the field, not the stadium.

The scrub area shouldn't overlap the river area, as much of a pain as it is to separate the two.

That is the name of the stadium, not the field. Reverted.

Don't do this! This is tagging for the renderer and not allowed on OSM.

It's not. Someone used the wrong tag.

Any legit reason not to?

The names are back.

The wiki is vague because there hasn't been a proposal to standardize fire station tagging. With that said, you tagged the building and grounds just how I'd do it.

I didn't mean to upload the nodes with PARCEL and POOLSQFT tags. Oops

Reverting old edits only gets problematic if there are intermediate edits. This generally isn't the case for deleted features, for obvious reasons.

You can undelete features in JOSM using the Undelete plugin. See here: osm.wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Undelete

Lots of strange address tags on node/9517862462

addr:state=SR in Texas? State Route 429 misinterpreted as state by crawler. node/11415726019

Attempting to revert individual changesets just makes it harder for the DWG. Let them handle it.